Re: arsclist Duplicating casette tapes

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: arsclist Duplicating casette tapes
From: Language Laboratories and Archives <language-labs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 11:39:26 -0500
In-reply-to: <000601c23eef$82f38b20$14876b41@nxlkhost.com>
Message-id: <p05101006b979a0960d7a@[128.135.57.21]>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020801121625.03936458@mail.richardhess.com> <p05101010b975fce6aa41@[128.135.57.21]> <000601c23eef$82f38b20$14876b41@nxlkhost.com>
Reply-to: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Title: Re: arsclist Duplicating casette tapes

Let me reply that DAT is one of the most unreliable storage formats out there, and would not be a recommended media type for this purpose.

-John Spencer

Otari Corp.

Can you be more specific? We have not found it to be unreliable.

Barbara

UofC Language Labs

--

- For subscription instructions, see the ARSC home page http://www.arsc-audio.org/arsclist.html Copyright of individual posting is owned by the author of the posting and permission to re-transmit or publish a post must be secured from the author of the post.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: arsclist Duplicating casette tapes
  - From: John Spencer

References:
- Re: arsclist Duplicating casette tapes
  - From: Richard L. Hess
- Re: arsclist Duplicating casette tapes
  - From: Language Laboratories and Archives
- Re: arsclist Duplicating casette tapes
  - From: John Spencer

Prev by Date: Re: DATs, Was Re: arsclist Duplicating casette tapes
Next by Date: Re: DATs, Was Re: arsclist Duplicating casette tapes
Previous by thread: Re: arsclist Duplicating casette tapes
Next by thread: Re: arsclist Duplicating casette tapes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: arsclist Duplicating casette tapes

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]