1. FINDINGS
MARGIN OF ERROR AND STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE
When we estimate characteristics of an entire population, based on
examining a sample of the population, there is some uncertainty in our
estimates. Margins of error and statistical significance help you
interpret our estimates in light of this uncertainty.
For example, if we estimate there are 15 million red cars in the U.S.,
with a margin of error of ±2 million, we mean there is a 95%
probability that the actual number of red cars is between 13 million and
17 million.
If we estimate there are 15 million red cars and 13 million blue cars,
and we say the difference is statistically significant, we mean there is
less than 5% probability that the estimates would show so many more red
cars if the actual numbers of red and blue cars were equal.
1.1 NUMBER OF MUSEUMS
Table shows our estimates for the number of museums in each group, based
on the survey data.
TABLE :
NON-PROFIT NON-FEDERAL MUSEUMS IN THE U.S., 1992
Count Share of
all museums
All museums 8,934 100%
Small 6,660 75%
Emerging 4,674+ 52%+
Minority 441 5%
Rural 3,842 43%
Because there were few or no respondents in some museum disciplines (for
example, no respondents were planetariums) we could not produce reliable
estimates of the number of museums in each discipline.
1.2 ATTENDANCE AND PUBLIC PROGRAMS
Museums report a mean number of general visits by the public
(attendance) of 38,543 annually for the period ending January 1992. The
only statistically significant difference between all museums and any
group is that small museums report a mean annual attendance of 16,073.
Table shows the share of museums that report conducting several types of
specialized programs.
TABLE : DID YOUR MUSEUM CONDUCT THESE ACTIVITIES DURING
1990 OR 1991?
Share Statistically
of all significant
museums differences
Scheduled school visits or programs 73% Small 70%
Scheduled adult visits or programs 66%
Held a special event for general public 70% Small 66%
1.3 SIZE OF STAFF
Museums report a mean full-time staff of 7 people, and a mean part-time
staff of 28 people, including both paid and unpaid staff.
The only statistically significant difference between all museums and
any group of museums is that small museums report fewer full-time staff,
with a mean of 2 people.
1.4 OPERATING BUDGET
Museums report an average operating expenditure of $367,000 as shown on
Table.
TABLE : MEAN 1991 OPERATING EXPENDITURE REPORTED BY MUSEUMS
All museums $367,000
Small 86,000
Emerging 468,000
Minority 342,720
Rural 161,000
Difference between all museums and each group except minority museums is
statistically significant.
1.5 LOCATION
Table shows the estimated number of museums in each geographic
region.Geographic regions are those used by IMS for statistical
purposes, and are defined as follows:
New England CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT
Mid-Atlantic DC, DE, MD, NY, NJ, PA, PR, VI
Southeastern AL, AR, FL, GA, KY, LA, MS, NC, SC, TN, VA, WV
Midwest IL, IN, IA, MI, MN, MO, OH, WI
Mountain/Plains CO, KS, MT, NE, NM, ND, SD, OK, TX, WY
Western AK, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA, AS, GU
TABLE : NUMBER OF MUSEUMS, BY REGION AND GROUP
New Mid- South- Mid- Mountain Western Margin
England Atlantic eastern west /Plains of Error
All museums 832 1,554 1,748 1,720 1,748 1,332 ±498
Small 640 1,163 1,221 1,309 1,425 902 ±440
Emerging 422 901 1,126 732 901 591 ±363
Minority 0 77 96 58 96 115 ± 92
Rural 409 613 672 730 1,022 497 ±339
Difference in regional distribution between all museums and each other
group is not statistically significant. All figures for Emerging Museums
are low-end estimates. See section.
Almost half of museums describe their location as a rural area, but only
a quarter say they are more than an hour's drive from a major urban
area, as shown in Tables and.
TABLE : SHARE OF MUSEUMS THAT GIVE VARIOUS DESCRIPTIONS OF
THEIR LOCATION
Share of Share of
all museums rural museums
Rural area 43% 100%
Suburban area 23% 13%
Urban area 33% 3%
Inner city 13% 1%
Some museums selected more than one description.
TABLE : SHARE OF MUSEUMS THAT SAY THEY ARE MORE THAN AN
HOUR'S DRIVE FROM:
Share of all Share of
museums rural museums
A major urban area 26% 45%
A college / university 13% 21%
Another museum 11% 19%
A major airport 25% 44%
The difference between all museums and rural museums is statistically
significant for each item in the tables above. The other statistically
significant differences between each group of museums and all museums
are:
- Small museums are more likely to describe their location as a rural
area (49% versus 43% for all museums), less likely to describe their
location as an urban area (28% versus 33%), and less likely to
describe their location as an inner city (11% versus 13%).
- Emerging museums are less likely to describe their location as a
rural area (37% versus 43% for all museums), more likely to describe
their location as suburban (28% versus 23%), less likely to say they
are more than an hour's drive from a college or university (9%
versus 13%), and less likely to say they are more than an hour's
drive from another museum (8% versus 11%).
- Minority museums are more likely to describe their location as an
inner city (30% versus 13% for all museums).
1.6 DAYS OPEN
Museums report that their exhibits or programs were open to the public
an average of 241 days in 1991, as shown in Table.
TABLE : DAYS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, AS REPORTED FOR 1991
Mean Margin
of error
All museums 241 ±13
Small 221 ±16
Emerging 246 ±18
Minority 277 ±47
Rural 218 ±22
The difference from all museums is statistically significant for small
and rural museums, but not for emerging or minority museums.
1.7 SOURCES OF INCOME
Museums report that earned income (such as admissions and sales) was
their most important source of operating income, as shown in Graph.
The statistically significant differences between each group of museums
and all museums are:
- Small museums are less likely to cite earned income as a major
source of operating income (56% versus 60% for all museums).
[Graphs removed from on-line edition.]
- Emerging museums are more likely to cite foundation or corporate
donations as a major source of operating income (28% versus 23% for
all museums) and more likely to cite city government (23% versus
19%).
- Minority museums are less likely to cite interest or investment
income as a major source of operating income (5% versus 27% for all
museums), more likely to cite the federal government (14% versus
5%), and more likely to cite tribal government (19% versus less than
1%). Rural museums are more likely to cite individual donations as a
major source of operating income (60% versus 53% for all museums),
less likely to cite foundation or corporate donations (17% versus
23%), and less likely to cite city government (14% versus 19%).
When asked what should be their main sources of financial support,
museums' most frequent response is earned income, as shown in Graph.
The statistically significant differences between each group of museums
and all museums are:
- Small museums are less likely to say that earned income should be a
main source of financial support (53% versus 58% for all museums),
and more likely to choose individual donations (45% versus 41%).
- Emerging museums are more likely to say that foundation and
corporate donations should be a major source of financial support
(55% versus 45% for all museums), less likely to choose county
government (7% versus 11%), and less likely to choose the federal
government (7% versus 10%).
- Minority museums are less likely to say that individual donations
should be a main source of financial support (14% versus 41% for
all museums), more likely to choose the federal government (38%
versus 10%), and more likely to choose tribal government (14% versus
1%). Rural museums are more likely to say that individual
donations should be a main source of financial support (50% versus
41% for all museums).
We see that what museums say should be their major sources of funding
are what are currently their major sources. By subtracting the number of
museums that say a source should be major from the source that say it is
major, we get a measure of the net number of museums that want to
increase (or decrease) the importance of each source, which is shown on
Graph.
1.8 APPLICATIONS FOR SUPPORT
Two-thirds of museums say they applied to a foundation or corporation
for financial support during 1990 or 1991, while fewer than half of
museums say they applied to the Federal government. More than a third of
museums say they didn't apply to any government, foundation or
corporation during the two years.
For all sources, most museums that applied report receiving funding at
least once during the two years, and this "win rate" was highest for
city government funding. Graph shows the results.
[Graphs removed from on-line edition.]
The most notable difference between groups of museums are that minority
museums are much more likely to say they applied to the Federal
government than other museums, and much less likely to say they didn't
apply to any of the funding sources.
Minority museums that applied to county government are less likely to
have received funding than other applicants. Note, however, that the
survey question only asked whether a museum applied to a source at least
once and whether it received funding at least once, so we cannot draw
conclusions about the share of applications that were funded. Table
compares groups of museums.
TABLE : HAS YOUR MUSEUM APPLIED TO ANY OF THESE
FOR FINANCIAL SUPPORT SINCE JANUARY 1990?
All
museums Small Emerging Minority Rural
SHARE OF MUSEUMS THAT APPLIED TO:
City 40% 36% 47% n.d. n.d.
County 30% n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.
State 59% 52% 66% n.d. n.d.
Federal 44% 35% n.d. 72% n.d.
Tribal 2% n.d. n.d. 42% 3%
Foundation or
Corporation 66% 58% 77% n.d. 60%
Applied to none
of the above 38% n.d. 25% 10% 47%
SHARE OF APPLICANTS THAT RECEIVED FUNDING FROM:
City 93% 89% n.d. n.d. n.d.
County 91% n.d. n.d. 67% n.d.
State 74% n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.
Federal 65% n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.
Tribal 67% n.d. 0% 100% 100%
Foundation or
Corporation 85% 80% n.d. n.d. 77%
n.d. means we found no statistically significant difference between the
group of museums and all museums.
[GRAPHS REMOVED FROM ON-LINE EDITION.]
1.9 SATISFACTION WITH FEDERAL ASSISTANCE
41% of museums say they are somewhat satisfied or very satisfied with
Federal assistance. The share of satisfied museums varies very little
between groups, as shown in Graph.
When museums were asked what would make federal funds easier to get or
use, the most popular choices were more information about federal
programs, and making the programs easier to apply for, as shown in
Graph.
The statistically significant differences between each group of museums
and all museums are as follows.
Small museums are more likely to choose "being eligible for federal
programs" as one of the three most useful improvements (24% versus
21% for all museums).
Emerging museums are more likely to choose "additional federal
programs" (17% versus 13% for all museums).
Minority museums are less likely to choose "easier to apply for
federal funds" (30% versus 52% for all museums), less likely to
choose "more information about federal programs" (20% versus 44%),
and more likely to choose "fewer restrictions on use of funds" (35%
versus 20%).
Rural museums are more likely to choose "easier to apply for federal
funds" (59% versus 52% for all museums), more likely to choose "more
information about federal programs" (51% versus 44%), less likely to
choose "more money in federal programs" (28% versus 40%), and more
likely to choose "more assistance in applying" (38% versus 30%).
[Graphs removed from on-line edition.]
1.10 NEED FOR MORE PEOPLE
Only six percent of museums say they don't need more people to
accomplish their activities. The most frequently cited need for more
people is to accomplish educational programs, as shown in Graph.
The statistically significant differences between each group of museums
and all museums are as follows.
Small museums are less likely to cite education programs as a
priority need for more people (65% versus 68% for all museums).
Emerging museums are less likely to say they have no need for more
people (3% versus 6% for all museums), more likely to cite education
programs as a priority need for more people (76% versus 68%), and
more likely to cite the "other" category as a priority need (14%
versus 10%). Rural museums are more likely to say they have no need
for more people (11% versus 6% for all museums), less likely to cite
exhibitions as a priority need for more people (39% versus 45%), and
less likely to cite education programs (61% versus 68%).
[Graphs removed from on-line edition.]
1.11 NEED FOR MORE TRAINING
Only thirteen percent of museums say they don't need more training to
accomplish their activities. Their highest priority needs for training
are in educational programs and collections care and management, as
shown in Graph.
The statistically significant differences between each group of museums
and all museums are as follows.
Small museums are more likely to cite collections care and
management as a priority need for more training (63% versus 59% for
all museums).
Emerging museums are more likely to cite the "other" category as a
priority need for more training (8% versus 6% for all museums).
Rural museums are more likely to cite research about collections as
a priority need for more training (37% versus 31% for all museums).
[Graphs removed from on-line edition.]
1.12 NEED FOR BETTER EQUIPMENT
Only six percent of museums say they don't need better equipment. Their
highest priority need for equipment is in collections care and
management, as shown Graph.
The statistically significant differences between each group of museums
and all museums are as follows.
Emerging museums are less likely to say they have no need for better
equipment (3% versus 6% for all museums), and more likely to cite
educational programs as a priority need for better equipment (67%
versus 61%).
[GRAPHS REMOVED FROM ON-LINE EDITION.]
1.13 NEED FOR MORE MONEY
Only three percent of museums say they don't need more money. Their
highest priority needs for money are educational programs, exhibitions,
and collections care and management, as shown in Graph.
The statistically significant differences between each group of
museums and all museums are as follows.
Small museums are less likely to cite educational programs as a
priority need for more money (63% versus 67% for all museums), less
likely to cite exhibitions (60% versus 64%), and less likely to cite
research about collections (13% versus 16%).
Emerging museums are more likely to cite educational programs as a
priority need for more money (73% versus 67% for all museums), and
more likely to cite general administration (33% versus 28%).
Minority museums are less likely to cite maintenance as a priority
need for more money (9% versus 33% for all museums).
Rural museums are more likely to cite maintenance as a priority need
for more money (39% versus 33% for all museums).
[Graphs removed from on-line edition.]
1.14 NEED FOR MORE SPACE
Seventeen percent of museums say they don't need more space. Among the
remainder, the greatest need for more space is for collections care and
management, as shown in Graph.
[GRAPHS REMOVED FROM ON-LINE EDITION.]
The statistically significant differences between each group of museums
and all museums are as follows.
Small museums are less likely to cite educational programs as a
priority need for more space (50% versus 55% for all museums).
Emerging museums are more likely to cite educational programs as a
priority need for more space (60% versus 55% for all museums), and
more likely to cite general administration (29% versus 24%).
Twenty-seven percent of museums say they don't need to expand their
building or move to a new building. Among those who say they need
to expand or move, the most often reported need is to be able to
raise funds, as shown in Graph.
[Graphs removed from on-line edition.]
The statistically significant differences between each group of museums
and all museums are as follows.
Small museums are less likely to choose "more support from local
businesses" as a priority (15% versus 19% for all museums).
Minority museums are more likely to choose "more support from the
federal government" as a priority (43% versus 20% for all museums),
and more likely to choose "more support from tribal government" (4%
versus less than 1%). Rural museums are less likely to choose "more
support from local businesses" as a priority (14% versus 19% for all
museums), and less likely to choose the "other" category as a
priority (less than 1% versus 1%).
1.15 MINORITY INVOLVEMENT
Table shows how museums characterize their minority involvement.
TABLE : SHARE OF MUSEUMS THAT REPORT VARIOUS TYPES OF
MINORITY INVOLVEMENT
All Minority
museums museums
Most of staff and governing body are minorities 5% 100%
Most visitors are minorities 10% 57%
Main purpose is to serve, or
interpret culture of, minorities 14% 83%
The difference between all museums and minority museums is statistically
significant in all cases.
The only other statistically significant difference we found between all
museums and any group of museums is that rural museums are more likely
to report that most of their visitors are minorities (14% versus 10% for
all museums).
Most museums that principally serve minorities, in terms of the museum's
visitors or its purpose, do not qualify as minority museums for this
study, because less than most of their staff and governing body are
minorities. The following table shows the figures.
TABLE : ESTIMATED NUMBER OF MUSEUMS
BY TYPES OF MINORITY INVOLVEMENT
Minority Other
museums museums
Most of staff and governing body are minorities 441 17
Most visitors are minorities 249 670
Main purpose is to serve, or
interpret culture of, minorities 364 850