EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
METHODOLOGY
Respondents returned 403 usable questionnaires, and IMS determined by
telephone that 36 of the non-respondents were not eligible museums, for
an instrument response rate of 83%.
This report presents our analysis of data from the Institute of Museum
Services' (IMS's) "National Needs Assessment" survey of museums.
IMS surveyed 524 museums by mail in 1992. The sample was drawn from a
list of 11,654 museums, which IMS created from its own records and 64
other lists of museums. The sample was random, except that IMS
intentionally over-sampled minority museums. We have adjusted for this
over-sampling in our analysis.
GROUPS OF MUSEUMS
Table E.1 shows our estimates of the number of museums, broken down by
group.
TABLE E.1:
NON-PROFIT NON-FEDERAL MUSEUMS IN THE U.S., 1992
Count Share of
all museums
All museums 8,934 100%
Small 6,660 75%
Emerging 4,674+ 52%+
Minority 441 5%
Rural 3,842 43%
For this study, "museum" is a nonprofit institution that is not part of
the U.S. Government, and which is organized on a permanent basis for
essentially educational or aesthetic purposes, and that owns or uses
tangible objects, either animate or inanimate; cares for these objects;
and exhibits them to the general public on a regular basis.
"Small Museum" is a museum that has five or fewer full-time paid or
unpaid staff, or that has an annual operating budget under $250,000.
"Emerging Museum" is a museum that has done one or more of the following
within the past two years:
- opened to the public for the first time
- formed a Board of Trustees or other governing authority
- developed bylaws, constitution, or charter
- developed a statement of purpose
- received 501(c)(3) status from the IRS
- developed its first long range plan
- started to raise operating funds
- started to raise capital funds
- established an endowment fund
- fundamentally revised its purpose
- appointed its first staff member
- appointed its first staff member whose job is curatorial or educational duties only.
"Minority Museum" is a museum whose staff and governing body are mostly
American Indians, Alaska Natives, Asians, Pacific Islanders, Blacks, or
Hispanics; and for which at least one of the following is true:
- The majority of its visitors or participants in its programs belong to one or more of the groups named above; or
- Its main purpose is to serve, or interpret the culture of, one or more of the groups named above.
"Rural Museum" is a museum that describes its location as rural.
THE DIFFERENT GROUPS OF MUSEUMS ARE VERY SIMILAR
For most questions on the survey, the groups of small, emerging,
minority and rural museums gave answers similar to the group of all
museums. In most cases, differences between groups were not large enough
to be statistically significant. Even where differences were
statistically significant, they were usually small.
The following sections describe the notable differences between groups
of museums.
SMALL MUSEUMS
Three quarters of U.S. museums are small, but small museums account for
only 31% of general visits by the public to museums. This is because the
mean number of visits per year is only 16,073 for small museums,
compared to 38,543 for all museums.
As expected, small museums report fewer full-time staff than all museums
(with a mean of two versus seven), and smaller mean operating budgets
($86,000 versus $367,000).
EMERGING MUSEUMS
Emerging museums are more active and entrepreneurial than museums in
general.
Emerging museums report a higher mean operating budget than all museums
($468,000 versus $367,000). They are more likely to report that
foundation or corporate donations are a major source of their operating
income (28% versus 23% for all museums), and more likely to say that
foundation and corporate donations should be a major source of financial
support (55% versus 45%).
Emerging museums are even less likely than museums in general to say
they have no need for more people (3% versus 6% for all museums), or no
need for better equipment (3% versus 6%).
MINORITY MUSEUMS
Most museums that principally serve minorities, in terms of the museum's
visitors or its purpose, do not have staffs and governing bodies
composed mostly of minorities, and therefore are not "minority museums"
by the definition of this study. Table E.2 shows the figures.
TABLE E.2:
NUMBER OF MUSEUMS
BY TYPES OF MINORITY INVOLVEMENT
Minority Other
Museums Museums
Most of staff and governing body are minorities. 441 17
Most visitors or program participants are minorities. 249 670
Main purpose is to serve, or interpret culture of,
minorities. 364 850
"Minorities" means American Indians, Alaska Natives, Asians, Pacific
Islanders, Blacks and Hispanics.
Minority museums report virtually the same mean operating expenditure as
all museums ($342,720 versus $367,000), but their sources of operating
income are different. Table E.3 shows the differences.
Minority museums are more active and confident in obtaining Federal
funds than other museums. Minority museums are more likely to have
applied to the Federal Government for financial support within the last
two years (72% versus 44% for all museums), and the share of applicants
that receive funds is as good or better for minority museums than
others.
TABLE E.3:
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MINORITY MUSEUMS
AND ALL MUSEUMS
IN SOURCES OF OPERATING INCOME
Share reporting that one of All Minority
its three major sources is: Museums Museums
Interest and Investments 27% 5%
Federal Government 5% 14%
Tribal Government 1% 19%
We found no statistically significant difference between minority
museums and all museums with regard to other sources of operating
income.
When asked what would make Federal funds easier to get and use, minority
museums are less likely to choose "easier to apply for federal funds"
(30% versus 52% for all museums), less likely to choose "more
information about federal programs" (20% versus 44%), and more likely to
choose "fewer restrictions on use of funds" (35% versus 20%). This
suggests that minority museums are already adept at obtaining Federal
funds, and are therefore more concerned about restrictions on the funds
they receive.
Minority museums look to the Federal government for additional support.
When asked what would be most useful to enable them to expand a building
or move to a new building, 43% of minority museums included "more
support from the federal government" in their top three choices,
compared to 20% of all museums.
Minority museums are much more likely than all museums to describe their
location as an inner city (30% versus 13%).
Minority museums that applied to a county government for financial
support within the last two years are significantly less likely to say
they received county support within that period (67% versus 91% for all
museums). But this pattern does not hold for city or State funding.
Minority museums are less likely to cite maintenance as a priority need
for more money (9% versus 33% for all museums).
RURAL MUSEUMS
Rural museums are more likely than museums in general to be distant from
other facilities, but fewer than half of rural museums face such
isolation, as shown on Table E.4.
TABLE E.4:
MUSEUMS THAT SAY THEY ARE MORE THAN AN HOUR'S DRIVE FROM:
Share of
All Rural
museums museums
A major urban area 26% 45%
A major airport 25% 44%
A college
or university 13% 21%
Another museum 11% 19%
We did not find any statistically significant difference between rural
museums and all museums in their distribution across geographic regions
(New England, Mid-Atlantic, etc.).
Rural museums report a smaller mean operating expenditure than all
museums ($161,000 versus $367,000).
When asked what would make Federal funds easier to get and use, rural
museums were more concerned with being able to apply, rather than the
total amount of money in the programs, as shown on Table E.5.
TABLE E.5:
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RURAL MUSEUMS AND ALL MUSEUMS
IN CHOICES FOR IMPROVING FEDERAL FUNDING
Share of museums
All Rural
Easier to apply 52% 59%
More information about programs 44% 51%
More money in programs 40% 28%
More assistance in applying 30% 38%
NEEDS OF MUSEUMS
Except as described above, small, emerging, minority and rural museums
were, as groups, similar to all museums in their descriptions of their
needs.
Almost every museum said it needed each resource the questionnaire asked
about. But there were patterns in what they said they needed the
resources for. Research, general administration, and maintenance were
not among the most-reported needs for any of the resources. Table E.6
summarizes these findings.
TABLE E.6:
MUSEUMS' NEEDS FOR RESOURCES
Share of museums Activities most reported
reporting need as needing this resource
More Money 97% Educational Programs
Exhibitions
Collections Care & Mngmt
More People 94% Educational Programs
Better Equipment 94% Collections Care & Mngmt
More Training 87% Educational Programs
Collections Care & Mngmt
More Space 83% Collections Care & Mngmt
FUNDING AND FEDERAL ASSISTANCE
Museums report that earned income (such as admissions and sales) was
their most important source of operating income, as shown in Graph.
When asked what should be their major sources of financial support,
museums generally pointed to their current sources of income. But there
were some notable differences.
For example, more museums want foundations and corporations to be a
major funding source than currently have it as a major source. Graph 2
shows that the difference between the number of museums that want
foundations and corporations to be a major source and the number of
museums that have it is equal to 22% of all museums. That is, the net
share of museums that want to increase the role of foundation and
corporate support is 22%.
[Graphs removed from on-line edition.]
By contrast, fewer museums want individual donations to be a major
funding source than currently have it as a major source. Graph 2 shows
that the net share of museums that want to increase the role of
individual donations is -11%.
[Graphs removed from on-line edition.]
Only 41% of all museums said they were satisfied that Federal assistance
was available to meet their needs. When asked what would make Federal
funds easier to get and use, the most popular choices were more
information about federal programs, and making the programs easier to
apply for, as shown in Graph.