Heritage Working Group paper

["David Hallam using S.u.S.E. Linux 5.1" <davidh@qu.net.au>]

Hmmm!
Dragging my mind back.
The concerns were raised thru Aiccm council rather than tru a paper to
the
CMHWG.
As at the time the exact continueing status of the  CMHWG. was under
question.
We do need to reraise this issue and get a paper to Aiccm Council and
CMHWG.
on our  opinions.
OK what do we want!
*       Seed funding.
*       National priorities?
*       Funding to colaborative ventures only.
*       An audit of current work.
*       A tim tam dispenser in every conseration science lab.
*       Conservation science distributed coordinated structure.

Ideas please
/dlh.

Oh thanks Alison for getting this dist list ont it's leggs.

[I have deleted your signature David, and also the repeat of my original
message. If no-one has any objections I will continue to edit all
messages in this way for the sake of brevity. Even better - if people
could edit out the <quoted> material where it is unnecesary that would
be great. Alison]