Subject: Denatured alcohols
Following my previous post regarding the application process for a licence to purchase Industrial Denatured Alcohol (IDA) from HMRC in the UK, I thought it might be useful for other conservators also looking to get a licence to know the outcome. HMRC had questioned why I could not just use Completely Denatured Alcohol (SAD), and were insistent on a solid reason. Advice I received from several other professionals, all indicated that in essence the purity of IDA is what makes it suitable and preferable over SAD. CDA (which now actually has a new recipe as of July 2013 of 100 parts ethanol, 3 parts isopropanol and 3 parts methylethylketone and denatonium benzoate) could in theory be suitable for conservation, but the effects of denatonium benzoate are unknown, it could potentially be harmful and might be retained in objects. Therefore it can be argued CDA should not be used. The small amounts required (less than 20 litres per year) and the nature of conservation work (scientific/educational etc), are also reasons that can back up any application, as these are stated as requirements within HMRC's own excise notice (Sections 7 and 8 of Excise Notice 473). I now have my licence, but should anyone else be looking to apply for a licence and encounter any problems, I would suggest putting forward the above reasoning. It would be interesting to know if anyone else has encountered problems with applying for a licence, or whether this was just an isolated case. Jillian Gregory Paper Conservator *** Conservation DistList Instance 28:39 Distributed: Friday, March 13, 2015 Message Id: cdl-28-39-001 ***Received on Monday, 9 March, 2015