Subject: Hand sanitizer
Isobel Griffin <i.griffin<-at->nls<.>uk> writes >The book-handlers in our library have asked whether it is acceptable >to apply antibacterial hand gels and then handle books. I'm >inclined to think that it is probably not a good idea, as the gels >could contain traces of materials that might stain the books, but I >wondered if anyone else has a view on this? If the reason for applying the sanitiser is to "clean" hands, this is pointless as their aim is to kill germs, not remove dirt. I carried out some research in 2008 that included the use of hand sanitisers in archives. I used Purell Instant Hand Sanitiser in my experiments. It is 62% w/v ethanol, and also includes water, isopropyl alcohol, glycerine, propylene glycol and fragrances. Its pH was 6.9. The gel was applied and left to air dry for several minutes. Handled papers were artificially aged for the equivalent of 50 years. I found that unwashed hands that had had sanitiser applied caused the pH of handled paper to fall very slightly (0.1 - 0.2 pH points) and there was also a visible colour change in handled papers where they were touched. Skin deposits were measured using the ninhydrin test and were found to be equally present in paper handled with unwashed hands both with and without the gel applied. The research was published in the 2008 AICCM Book, Paper and Photographic Materials Symposium Proceedings, and is available for download from <URL:http://www.aiccm.org.au/aiccm-publications/conference-proceedings/some-day-my-prints-will-come-or-you-cant-handle-truth> Prue McKay Supervising Conservator Projects and Exhibitions Preservation and Digitisation Collection Management National Archives of Australia Cnr. Sandford Street and Flemington Road Mitchell ACT 2911 PO Box 7425 Canberra Business Centre ACT 2610 +61 2 6212 6220 Fax: +61 2 6212 3469 *** Conservation DistList Instance 27:26 Distributed: Monday, December 16, 2013 Message Id: cdl-27-26-002 ***Received on Sunday, 15 December, 2013