Subject: New online forum: ALTCONS
In our daily work, our online groups, meetings and publications we focus on treatment methods. That's great; we're an applied field. Only occasionally do we discuss the underlying assumptions and 'high' theory that we share as we apply these methods. I think our field is now at a point where such discussions may help further its development by increasing our professional self-awareness. So believing that good things sometimes start from the ground up I've started a new Google Group, ALTCONS "Alternative Conservation Discussions". Please join the discussion by signing up at <URL:https://groups.google.com/d/forum/altcons> and posting your thoughts to altcons<-at->googlegroups<.>com As examples here are three topics I've started for your consideration: Conservators are not scientists. We work every day in the space we have created between science and the humanities. Yet we constantly appeal to science to authorize our methods at the same time that research scientists distance themselves from our applications. We make appeals to the humanities while its researchers distance themselves from our materials-based approach. Can we build a unified conservation theory without appealing to our reluctant neighbors? Conservators see the world in a unique way. Place a jumble of tableware in front of an archaeologist and a conservator. The archaeologist will see them as knives, forks and spoons; the conservator will see them as ferrous, cuprous and argentous. This way of seeing has value as an interpretive viewpoint. What would an 'interpretive conservation' look like? What would happen to our ethics and our place in the academy if we deliberately treated objects interpretively? Conservators must act. Under conditions of high stress and uncertainty conservators must sometimes make irrevocable decisions. We must act; whether we choose to do nothing or choose some radical treatment we act. This is an unusual job requirement when compared with our colleagues pursuing art historical and archaeological research. How does it affect our approach to decision making and to the historic materials we act upon? Dennis Piechota Archaeological Conservator Fiske Center for Archaeological Research University of Massachusetts Boston Office: 617-287-6829 Altcons Group Admin *** Conservation DistList Instance 27:19 Distributed: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 Message Id: cdl-27-19-009 ***Received on Tuesday, 29 October, 2013