Subject: Sharing knowledge
Niccolo Caldararo <caldararo [at] aol__com> writes >About 30 years ago Robert Organ proposed an venue for conservators >to share their work. He called it the National Institute for >Conservation. This institute would preserve all the treatments of >conservators the world over as a resource to present and future >conservators. It would be both an archive and a living facility >where people could do research and have questions answered about >what people had done in what situations so that archived reports >could be mined for decision making evidence. >... >I think this site could function much like Robert Organ had hoped >his NIC would. People could upload their treatment reports, >experiments on materials, etc., images of problems and we could all >download these articles, images and data and discuss problems >together. If Niccolo Caldararo's (and Robert Organ's) proposal advances, and there will be a (presumably restricted) venue where professional conservators can share with each other detailed reports of their work, that venue ought to include a signpost pointing to Conservation OnLine. Because perusing CoOL's searchable archive of decades of technical communications on the Conservation DistList could inspire someone to devise a needed new technique--and help someone else to avoid 'reinventing the wheel.' While conservators are comparing evolving methodologies of modern conservation/restoration, we need to be aware also that the ethics of our field are still evolving. CoOL makes it easy to compare the Codes of Ethics of many cultural-preservation organizations, by providing hyperlinks directly to them: <URL:http://cool.conservation-us.org/bytopic/ethics/> Jean D. Portell (biographer of the late art conservators, Sheldon and Caroline Keck) 13 Garden Place Brooklyn, NY 11201 *** Conservation DistList Instance 27:6 Distributed: Saturday, July 20, 2013 Message Id: cdl-27-6-005 ***Received on Wednesday, 17 July, 2013