Subject: Deltathor
***** On Mar 4, 2013, at 7:22 PM, Conservation DistList wrote: *****> Dominique Rogers <do [at] rioplata__co__u ***** Re: heat treatments for pest control Dominique Rogers <do [at] rioplata__co__uk> writes >Jerry Shiner <info [at] keepsafe__ca> writes > >>Valerie Tomlinson <vtomlinson [at] aucklandmuseum__com> writes >> >>>Wouldn't heat treatment be simpler? I've forgotten if this idea was >>>mentioned earlier in the string and discarded. >>>... >> >>Valerie brings an interesting perspective, as heat treatment is a >>simple and underused insect control method. However, in this >>situation, I think the problem is not merely one of method, but of >>scale. How do you ramp up any treatment to be both safe and >>effective on something as big as a railway coach? ... > >I am surprised by the question raised against heat treatment. Am I >being totally out of date with present research on its effects? I >thought that Thermo Lignum had sorted the problem with their process >in the 90s? See: We just had a meeting of the IPM working group that runs the MuseumPests.net web site, and are re-writing the section on heat treatment. I hope the new version will be up in a couple of weeks. I have no doubt that it is under-used. There are three possible reasons not to use it: deterioration of DNA, accelerated aging, and problems with relative humidity. The first issues are very rare--probably a limited percentage of biological research collections for the first, very few for the second; many routine conservation treatments use temperatures at least as high, if not higher, and items extremely sensitive to RH may be a problem, but people who use the method have a variety of ways to avoid a steep drop in RH. Barbara Appelbaum Appelbaum and Himmelstein 444 Central Park West New York, NY 10025 212-666-4630 Fax: 212-316-1039 *** Conservation DistList Instance 26:42 Distributed: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 Message Id: cdl-26-42-002 ***Received on Thursday, 7 March, 2013