Subject: Unpaid positions
Re: Unpaid Internships and Fellowships Years ago an advertisement appeared in the Conservation DistList for an unpaid fellowship at a public art gallery in the U.S. I posted a comment then that I felt such arrangements were unprofessional and degrading and I badly offended a valued colleague, for which I have always been sorry. While disappointed to see another offer of an unpaid position I will try this time to temper my language to avoid offence while still expressing my deep concern. I believe most conservators are paid little enough given long training and the specialised and exacting nature of their work and compared with other professionals. More to the point for me, I came to the profession when it had previously been a career for people who could afford long academic study followed by an equally long period of unpaid or lowly paid work to establish themselves. It was largely a calling for those of independent means. The profession grew enormously in the 1960s and 70s at least partly because the late Sheldon and Caroline Keck worked so hard to find funding for scholarships for the training courses,internships and post graduate positions and this opened the profession to less well off people. I benefited enormously from this and later, as a teacher and administrator, I felt I owed it to the Kecks and others to find similar support for students and new graduates. I was pressured to use unpaid people in the name of great need and lack of funding but was able to avoid doing so until I was fortunate enough to have a Director who took little convincing that we could do much needed work on the collections by offering supervised experience for talented recent graduates while contributing significantly to the general pool of expertise and helping provide for our succession planning. He courageously diverted considerable acquisition funding towards four development conservator positions for up to three years at a time which each paid a living wage. He reasoned there was little point in acquiring things you couldn't care for and that the storerooms were full of items in too poor condition to display. Each development conservator was formally reviewed quarterly and when looking for subsequent jobs had an impressive and greatly detailed portfolio. The reports went to the Director as well as the funding body. This arrangement survived two succeeding Directors until superseded by a smaller privately funded programme. Over 40 young conservators so far have benefitted and several returned to us in permanent positions. It is hard work and one success often leads to another. We need to make a case about building expertise sustainably within our institutions over a long period of time and that our work is mission critical. I don't think free work is much valued in the long run and worry unpaid positions set uncomfortable precedents and is a slippery slope. I well understand the pressure to provide expert care for needy collections in times of scarce funding, but consider what message an unpaid position for a trained professional sends- for that person, for their colleagues, for the administrators and senior managers whose names attach to the idea, for the branding of the institution, and for prospective students in our profession. I believe unpaid positions are a step backwards in this profession. Tom Dixon Melbourne Australia *** Conservation DistList Instance 26:26 Distributed: Sunday, November 18, 2012 Message Id: cdl-26-26-003 ***Received on Saturday, 17 November, 2012