Subject: Questionnaire on preservation of contemporary urban graffiti
This questionnaire is part of a research project carried out for University College London on "Contemporary Urban Graffiti Preservation". I would be very glad to know what is the opinion of conservators and other heritage professionals about this very controversial topic. First, I would like to thank you in advance for your time in answering these questions. Second, please have fun with this. Skip questions you don't feel like answering, and include whatever comes to mind that you find interesting. Links to videos, photos, projects or writings of yours are very welcome. Name (Optional): Country: In which heritage field do you work?: What do you think of the shift in perception of graffiti, once seen as solely vandalism and now seen as a form of art? What do you think is the current approach of heritage professionals towards graffiti? Graffiti are often exhibited in galleries and museums. Some graffiti are now highly valued and there have been proposals to protect them. Moreover, graffiti are sometimes 'preserved' in the streets by 'amateur conservators' with Perspex. Why do you think this happens?Do you think that graffiti should be considered as cultural heritage? What is your attitude towards the preservation of graffiti? Should we take a different approach compared to more established art? Which criteria should be adopted to decide which graffiti should be protected and which should not? Recently, two graffiti painted by Banksy in Palestinian territory have been cut out of the wall and shipped to England to be displayed in a gallery. To what extent do you think this is a form of preservation intervention? What role do you think the point of view of heritage professionals should play in current policies about graffiti? As a heritage professional, to what extent the intentional temporary nature of graffiti should play a role in decisions regarding its preservation? What method should be used to preserve graffiti? For example: preventive conservation only; they should be restored when damaged; preservation should aim to record and document graffiti, the process of creation, the artist comments etc. (through photographs,videos and interviews etc.) without avoiding damage from occurring; etc. Who should preserve them? (e.g the artist, a professional conservator, etc.) Which stakeholders do you think should be in charge of deciding what graffiti to preserve and what criteria should be adopted in doing so? Please send a copy of the questionnaire to m.orsini.11<-at->ucl<.>ac<.>uk Miriam Orsini *** Conservation DistList Instance 26:10 Distributed: Sunday, July 29, 2012 Message Id: cdl-26-10-017 ***Received on Friday, 27 July, 2012