Subject: Ethical and aesthetic issues in conservation of an easel painting
I am a conservation-restoration student at the Arts Academy in Split, Croatia. I am currently working on my Master thesis, the conservation treatment of a 17th century retable painting representing Our Lady of Mount Carmel and The Baptism of Christ. The painting is missing its stretcher and it has been trimmed. It is, however, quite possible to reconstruct its original dimensions, as there is another painting in the same church with identical iconography, dating from the 18th century. The later painting replaced the earlier one in the 18th century, but the altar is unfortunately lost. In order to strengthen the original canvas and to be able to attach the painting to a new stretcher, the painting will have to be lined. It has been decided that the original size of the painting will be simulated or reconstructed. The question is how to achieve this in an aesthetically acceptable manner and in compliance with conservation ethics. I've managed to find one example similar (to some extent ) to the problem I am trying to solve: The Execution of Maximilian by E. Manet. A short description of this painting's history can be found on the website of the National Gallery in London: <URL:http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/ paintings/edouard-manet-the-execution-of-maximilian> **** Moderator's comments: The above URL has been wrapped for email. There should be no newline. Any treatment documentation or literature on this issue would be of great help. If someone has come across an easel painting with similar problems, I would be grateful for sharing any useful information. Jelena Zagora Student, Conservation-Restoration Department Arts Academy of the University of Split Fausta Vrancica 17 21000 Split, Croatia *** Conservation DistList Instance 25:32 Distributed: Monday, January 9, 2012 Message Id: cdl-25-32-012 ***Received on Saturday, 7 January, 2012