Subject: Talk on cleaning acrylic emulsion paints
The ICON Paintings Group invite you to a talk given by Professor Richard Wolbers of Winterthur Museum, University of Delaware Cleaning of Acrylic Emulsion Paints: Preliminary extractive studies with two commercial acrylic paint systems using 3D microscopy and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) Tuesday, 28 June 2011 Doors open at 6pm Talk begins at 6.30pm prompt In the Grand Robing Room at Freemason's Hall, 60 Great Queen Street, London WC2B 5AZ Close to both Covent Garden and Holborn Tube Stations Doors open at 6pm Tickets: ICON members UKP10 Non-members: UKP15 Please register by sending your name and stating if you are an ICON member Your name must be on the security list no later than Friday, 24 June 2011 Free wine and cheese inc. in price of ticket RSVP Clare Finn +44 20 7937 1895 finnclare<-a t->aol< . >com There has been a steadily growing body of literature within the conservation research community specifically designed to evaluate the impact of solvents including water on both swelling and extraction of acrylic dispersion paint film used in fine art applications. Water and other solvent conditions tested thus far on these acrylic paint films have tended to extract significant, measurable quantities of paint film components, supporting the idea that both traditional easel painting aqueous and solvent cleaning and coating strategies for conserving paintings and painted artefacts that carry these types of paints will severely compromise these materials. To date, only a very limited number of aqueous conditions have been tested. More concerted data has been needed to fully evaluate the impact of a wider range of aqueous conditions on these surfaces. To this end, we've begun a series of experiments specifically designed to look at pH and conductivity effects of cleaning solutions on acrylic paints. In the present study, two contemporary commercial acrylic dispersion paint systems will be evaluated: Golden Acrylic Colors 'Heavy Body Tube Colors' and ColArt International's 'Liquitex Acrylic Tube Colors'. Preliminary results of extraction experiments will be presented. These will include physical swelling data from a 'matrix' style application of aqueous solutions to test paint samples. The matrix used was an 8 x 8 array of triethanolamine /citrate or ethanolamine/citrate buffered aqueous solutions (50 mM) that vary in pH 2.5-9.5) and conductivity (principally using NaCl from 0.5-48.0 mS) for a total of 64 distinct application solutions or conditions. The effects of the application of these 64 solutions will be presented in two ways. 3D microscopy (Phaseview's MicroPhase Camera) was used to record volume, surface area, and surface roughness of the paint samples as they were swollen in time. The MicroPhase system was used to acquire z-stack images of the paint samples in standard, uniform-sized paint micro 'dots' (10 micrometre diameter) utilizing a laser line at 488 nm (ArKr laser, 30 mW) with a 10x Plan Neofluar (NA 0.3) objective. The resultant 3D images provide quantitative information about the physical changes that occur in the test paint samples over the course of 15 min incubations under the aqueous 'matrix' solutions. The results will be graphically presented to help illustrate 'high' swelling conditions, as well as any 'low' swelling aqueous conditions for the test paints. Additionally, the supernatant solutions were drawn off after 15 min incubations and analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) using a Shimadzu Prominence HPLC interfaced with an Applied BioSystems 3200 QTRAP. Specifically, the extractable nonionic surfactant moieties leached into these supernatants were quantified for each matrix condition. The individual alkyl phenolethoxylate (APEO) levels were quantified by ESI+ ionization using [M+NH4]+ precursor ions. Preliminary experiments on non-ionic surfactants such as Triton X-305, Triton-405 suggests that ammonium buffered mobile phases are preferred and MS-MS fragmentation on ammonium adducts appears to produce the expected ethoxylate and phenol ethoxylate precursor ions for selective multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) identification of APEOs with different ethoxylate chain lengths. An ammonium formate buffered methanol/water mobile phase was used for the reverse phase C-18 separation of the APEOs with optimized MRM transitions for individual polymer chain lengths. The use of precursor ion scans was used to generate criteria for subsequent linear ion trap (LIT) scans using an information dependent acquisition in Analyst software. These LIT triggered scans were used to provide a means to identify degradation or proprietary formulation ingredients in the surface leachates. *** Conservation DistList Instance 24:53 Distributed: Monday, May 30, 2011 Message Id: cdl-24-53-008 ***Received on Tuesday, 24 May, 2011