Subject: Interpretive Conservation
Dennis Piechota <dennis.piechota [at] umb__edu> writes >With some trepidation I want to propose for discussion an idea that >may be heretical, Interpretive Conservation, an expression I've made >up for writings by conservators that would not discuss treatments or >preservation in any way. The goal would be to develop the >conservator's unique way of seeing objects, collections and even >intangible heritage as the basis for directly and independently >interpreting artists, cultures and historical contexts. I very much appreciate this idea. You know Columbia University has a program in narrative medicine which "...fortifies clinical practice with the narrative competence to absorb, metabolize, interpret and be moved by the stories of illness" Ever since I heard of that I have wondered about narrative conservation as a concept. The Columbia program aims to help the medical profession improve the effectiveness of their care, and heal an ailing health care system...these ideas could perhaps fruitfully be applied to an ailing cultural heritage "system" as well, seeing how fragile funding and support can be. In any case, "narrative conservation" aside, I think adding an " interpretive conservation" possibility to the mix for those who would like to publish is an excellent idea. I think this is the direction conservation blogs often head, and our field is the richer for it. Chela Metzger Conservator of Library Collections Winterthur, DE *** Conservation DistList Instance 24:42 Distributed: Tuesday, March 8, 2011 Message Id: cdl-24-42-005 ***Received on Wednesday, 23 February, 2011