Subject: Invisible ink
On behalf of a colleague Nicole Hayes <nicole [at] ica-artconservation__org> writes > I was at a symposium recently and one of the speakers > recommended rare books be marked with invisible ink (visible > under UV light) so as to be traceable. He assured the audience > that these inks were archival, and called them "Identi-kits." Some of the commercial products I looked at were specifically designed for marking property permanently. It seems like a very unobtrusive method of marking, capable of giving a false confidence to the owner. The main limitation for conservation application is that exposure to light can cause the inks to stop fluorescing under UV light. Some of the basic experiments I performed for this research revealed that the optical brighteners in the ink could be almost entirely exhausted if exposed to sunlight for one day. So if a marked item was exposed to enough UV exciting light, it would look clean for resale. My testing did not address extended artificial aging to examine possible yellowing of the ink and substrate over time, but there is published research in optical brightening agents (OBA) and Dayglow paints showing the marks go a dull brown when the UV excitation is exhausted. So there is no long-term guarantee that these markings would stay invisible. Of course, we would presume that the light exposure of a page in a volume housed at a cultural institution would be far less than the exposure I mentioned above. Nevertheless, I think it's important to consider non-ideal situations when we are talking about theft, since "recovery" only happens after the item has been removed from our care and control. Regardless of the chosen marking method, a determined and informed thief could easily deface these markings and obscure the book's provenance. Personally, I do not think invisible ink has many advantages over other, more traditional, marking methods such as stamping, embossing, and plating. Sonja P. Reid *** Conservation DistList Instance 23:22 Distributed: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 Message Id: cdl-23-22-001 ***Received on Tuesday, 1 December, 2009