Subject: Acrylic coated board
I'd like to know if anyone who has responsibility for the preservation of archival collections is contemplating or has decided to make the switch to using manuscript boxes constructed from acrylic coated board. I've obtained the MSDS from Metal Edge West for the acrylic coated board they are currently using. Although the ingredients seem to have an extremely low toxicity, the chemical composition of "Micryl 763R" by Michelman, Inc appears to be proprietary information. Metal Edge also paid IPI to conduct physical degradation and PAT testing; Metal Edge will provide the testing results with that explanation to interested parties. The primary issues I am weighing include: 1. Does the acrylic coating provide enough water repellence to warrant the extra cost (approximately 14% more than the standard grey-white board)? It appears that extra protection would be gained by water dripping from above, but if water poured in around the boxes in any great quantity, an entry point is still available in the seams on the bottom edges of the box--although the box board itself would afford a measure of water resistance. 2. Is it obsessive to be concerned about the reduced air exchange that may occur between the box contents (sitting unused on a shelf) and the storage environment due to the acrylic coating? Could that have any negative effects? 3. One of the primary selling points seems to be the "look" of the box board, and the obvious protection from fingerprints and general soil appearing on the outside of the box. Sends a good message to the patron/user about how we care for our collections. Cathy Aster Head of Preservation Services Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6010 650-723-2132 *** Conservation DistList Instance 14:33 Distributed: Monday, December 18, 2000 Message Id: cdl-14-33-019 ***Received on Friday, 15 December, 2000