Subject: AIC
I must thank Dr. Reedy and Barbara Appelbaum for their responses to my original post on the need for publications on treatments. They both reinforced what I said, there are few treatment articles and both stated that the JAIC was interested and open to publishing more. The only problem is to change the attitude conservators have to the perceived position of the JAIC which is preventing them from sending their articles to the JAIC. Might I suggest putting some more bench conservators on the publications board or the JAIC editorial board? Someone like Jack Thompson for example, who has experience as an editor and translator. Which brings up another related point. I was rather amused to find that the current issue of the JAIC which is devoted entirely to disaster preparedness has not one reference in a foreign language. I may have missed something, but I went over it twice. Do we really think when we read articles in English that no one else in the world is doing anything worth noting? It would seem to me the responsibility of the editors to make sure that those people writing should include (if not be aware of similar work being done abroad). This does not seem to be the usual case with most issues of the JAIC, but it does give the impression that we know it all. In 1989 Luis Monreal was quoted by Don Garfield (Museum News, Jan/Feb 1989:50-3) that in conservation (the)"...scientific understanding of the deterioration process--fundamental for conservation--and the chemical behavior of certain materials used by the profession is 'as primitive as was medicine in the time of Moliere." I agree, but we cannot progress if we do not break from our present provincialism and recognize that there is much to learn (and much being done elsewhere outside of the USA) and much more to discover. Niccolo Caldararo Director and Chief Conservator Conservation Art Service *** Conservation DistList Instance 14:8 Distributed: Thursday, July 27, 2000 Message Id: cdl-14-8-003 ***Received on Saturday, 22 July, 2000