Subject: Accreditation
Following on from Deborah Rohan's posting in regard to Mario Galea's plight, I have a different focus on the problem, but a similar point to make, none the less. Recently when the IPC started it's accreditation ball rolling a colleague who, like me, is a member (and his father before him) approached the IPC and asked how accreditation would affect framer members. In my view he got short shrift. Framers cannot in the foreseeable future be accredited in any way, according to the IPC's Framer's Liaison Officer. It was suggested that my colleague get a degree in conservation, which would involve closing his business down for three years in this instance! I understand that many conservators work in academic environments, and also that many have to deal with works of art that have been poorly framed, thus their opinion of unqualified framers may well be coloured by experience. However it is the mission of some of us in framing to create an establishment of framers who can be trusted to work on art on paper or otherwise, using methods and materials which are acceptable to conservators. If you like, they would be technicians working with conservators. However, as things currently stand, I can see it difficult for framers to describe their work as of preservation or conservation standard. Thus accreditation creates a circumstance where the contribution of a newly qualified graduate in conservation, has more value than a framer of 20-30 years experience,--this is not meant to be derogatory. I feel that in the case of time served conservators and others, without degrees who do not match up to the rigours of examination by those that do, there needs to be something that they can do, perhaps on a part time level to save their livelihood. Stephen Todd frameconnews mailing list moderator *** Conservation DistList Instance 13:11 Distributed: Friday, July 30, 1999 Message Id: cdl-13-11-006 ***Received on Tuesday, 27 July, 1999