Subject: Historic dirt surfaces
**** Moderator's comments: Please respond directly to the author. Most roads, footpaths, and many other areas in historic and archaeological sites have been unpaved dirt surfaces. In many sites those surfaces have been replaced by different types of pavement, most frequently concrete or blacktop, to provide better access for visitors (and to be ADA compliant), reduce erosion, dust and mud development, and reduce necessary maintenance work. Often this is an unsatisfactory solution since the modern pavement can change the whole character of a site. Two alternate approaches have been used occasionally: * chemical consolidation of existing dirt surfaces * pavements that simulate the appearance of dirt surfaces For a non-profit client, under contract from the NCPTT, I am presently undertaking research into the current practices and experiences in the use of consolidated or simulated dirt surfaces with the goal of developing a testing and evaluation program for the most promising consolidation or surfacing materials. I would like to hear about the different approaches and materials colleagues have been taken and about their experiences with respect to appearance, strength, durability, maintenance requirements, installation cost, performance under hot, cold, dry, and wet conditions, etc. Any information would be greatly appreciated. Please reply off-list to fdp [at] aol__com. After completion of the project a summary of the findings will be posted to the list. Frank D. Preusser Frank Preusser & Associates, Inc. 6434 Pat Avenue West Hills, CA 91307 818-348-0481 Fax: 818-348-1764 *** Conservation DistList Instance 13:3 Distributed: Thursday, June 24, 1999 Message Id: cdl-13-3-008 ***Received on Wednesday, 23 June, 1999