Subject: Fire retardants and modern marouflage
I am currently reviewing a project proposal where complete replacement of a decorative scheme painted on a large groin-vaulted ceiling is necessary. The firm proposes to paint onto canvas and install canvas into the vault cells using adhesives--primarily as a cost-saving technique (as opposed to painting directly onto the plaster) but with the added benefits of stabilizing the plaster during earthquakes and being removable for eventual substrate repairs. The City requires that the canvas be treated with a Class A fire-retardant and I am curious about the potential for chemical reactivity within the proposed system--possibly at one or more of the interfaces between substrate, adhesive, treated canvas and the paint film system. Through my own research and collegial inquiries: I have found that proprietary fire retardants for canvas are largely complex, soluble, ammonium salts. Several muralists and mural conservators have had success using the salts-treated canvas and acrylic emulsion paint systems (as is proposed for this project) with two differences--their examples were either stretcher-hung or installed vertically on a wall, not upside-down, and another example had only one side of the canvas salt-treated (verso) and used Beva gel as the adhesive (clay-based adhesive proposed for this project). Sunbrella-brand synthetic canvas was considered as a replacement for the salts-treated cotton canvas but would seem to be too adhesion-resistant ("too slick to stick," as one person put it). Sunbrella-brand canvas is a Class A "self-extinguishing" material with a fluorocarbon coating--the more one looks into it the more it seems like a Teflon-type fabric. Does anyone have more to add to this information? Anecdotal information welcome--and has been quite helpful. Molly Lambert Architectural Conservation San Francisco *** Conservation DistList Instance 12:81 Distributed: Tuesday, April 20, 1999 Message Id: cdl-12-81-019 ***Received on Friday, 9 April, 1999