Subject: Chlorine dioxide
As a chemist, I feel I have to respond to Ellen McCrady's piece about chlorine dioxide (Instance 12:79, April 6, 1999). The first point is that chlorine dioxide is the same substance and has the same properties, no matter how it is prepared. The same goes for hydrogen peroxide. I guess that what is different in this case is that only very small quantities of the reagent are prepared at the point of use, and that there is a built-in mechanism for neutralising any excess, so that there is no danger of any explosion or harmful residues. As Ellen says, we won't know what's in the sachets until they're on the market, but I would guess that they contain a chlorate plus a crystalline acid and maybe also a hygroscopic salt. When the RH rises, the salt deliquesces, the acid dissolves and ClO2 is formed. When the RH falls, the salt dries out and the reaction stops. As I say, this is only a guess. The second point is that there is no relation between the number of different elements in a compound and its potential for causing environmental damage. It all depends on how the atoms are connected, in other words, what compounds are formed. The same atoms can be combined one way to make a harmless compound, and another way to make a dangerous one. All this is not to say that "green chemistry" is not a valid approach. It has to make sense to minimise the amounts of dangerous substances used, and to ensure that any residues are decomposed before they are released into the environment. Dr Barry Knight English Heritage London *** Conservation DistList Instance 12:81 Distributed: Tuesday, April 20, 1999 Message Id: cdl-12-81-001 ***Received on Wednesday, 14 April, 1999