Subject: Smoke
Ronald Harvey <rsharvey [at] tidewater__net> writes >I have just received a call about smoke and fire related odors in an >historic house. I am interesting in knowing conservators >experiences with treating smoke and soot deposits within an historic >house--original plaster walls, reproduction wallpaper, multiple >paint layers on interior woodwork. The past year I've had four fire-damage projects--one gallery and three homes. Steve Prins and I have learned a few things from industry about removing smoke volatiles from objects and structures. He may have some additional comments and I'll forward the question to him. Barry Bauman, at the Chicago Conservation Center is known by the post-fire recovery industry as somewhat of a clearinghouse for smoke and fire damaged paintings and objects. The ServiceMaster company, in particular, told me that Barry has used ozone very effectively. He may have some suggestions as well and it may be worth a call. Here's a summary of my experiences: 1. The smoke smell compounds are volatile and come out whatever material they have attached themselves to in curve very much liken to half-life curves of heat and chemical distribution models. They come out fastest when the concentration in the surrounding air is lowest and concentration in the wall, object, floor, whatever is highest. The rate of evolution slows when the concentration in the surrounding air becomes increasingly saturated and as the concentration in the substrate decreases. Really just the opposite of the application curve when the smoke compounds were distributed onto the surfaces during the fire. 2. Getting rate that you can get the compounds out of surfaces is increased by: * Keeping the concentration in the surrounding air low, e.g. Using zeolites or activated charcoal, as you suggest, (useful only in enclosed containers for objects) or air washing with fresh-air continuously; * Raising the temperature of the object that holds the smoke compounds and the surrounding air (the rate of release is temperature dependent). Heating the room to about 90 degrees F with fresh forced air has been very effective is speeding up the rate of smoke diffusion and release. This also works well with the objects in closed containers containing zeolites and activated charcoal. Obviously, the ability of the object and materials in question to safely withstand elevated temperatures and lowered RH is an important controlling factor, as well. Remember, though, the smoke was deposited at several hundred times that temperature and, while the good news is that it will eventually release to a point below human sensitivity, there just is no fast, cheap or easy way to speed it up. 3. The compounds can be oxidized into smaller, non-smoky materials using ozone, which is what the fire-clean-up industry does. They use ozone generators and chambers or sealed rooms. For non-porous surfaces, this can be pretty effective. In porous surfaces, it tends to break up the first layer of deposition and then result in delayed release of more deeply deposited smoke compounds. It also causes accelerated oxidation of the substrate material--as you can imagine, bad for paper, textiles, anything with high surface area to mass ratios and oxidation sensitive materials (most everything!). 4. For surfaces that can be wet-treated, initiating the oxidation with hydrogen peroxide solutions and UV light, either from sun-light or from tanning lamps, works extremely well. *** Conservation DistList Instance 12:76 Distributed: Friday, March 26, 1999 Message Id: cdl-12-76-001 ***Received on Wednesday, 24 March, 1999