Subject: Professional qualifications
Thank you Jack Thompson. I was wondering when someone would massage their cortex and throw another perspective into this fray. I have enjoyed working with both types of practitioners in my short tenure as a paper conservator. Yes, that's what I believe I am. I challenge anyone to dispute that rationally. As a parallel to the chimera of raising the professional standards in our field, I would like to relate the story of the practicing architect. There was a time when anyone who wished to qualify as an architect apprenticed with an established practitioner(s) then took the exam. Nowadays only people who go through the academic programs are allowed to take the exam. Surprisingly most of the test takers failed on their first attempt. The areas most failed at were business, office management, and project management. The test designs were good, but the ability to execute them was lacking. My only point is that in the rush to "professionalize" a field, the technique most often employed is academic inundation. For instance, you need this class in order to say you know this, and so forth and so on. I don't know of a profession that has survived long without being turned into a "craftsmen free zone". Most professions end up being fully absorbed by the schools one attended and not one's abilities and experiences. But let us be realistic. Part of the reason why many organizations attempt to hire people with goat skins is based upon the H.L. Menken quote referred to by Thompson. Many grant giving organizations show a marked preference toward a firm or museum that have graduates. In the same vein, most of the more advanced workshops and classes offered in this country are meant for or targeted toward 'graduates of a recognized program', not people who have learned on the job. When non-graduates are kept from advanced learning opportunities, then you have a job market better suited to the ones who fit the bill (surprise). Soon more members of the AIC will be from a program and old codgers like Mr. Thompson (no offense) will be a thing of the past. Enough ranting for today. Suffice it to say, myriad types can exist and thrive in this field, but the type which can't is the one with no demonstrable skills. A graduate degree should not keep them from being weeded out. It's not brain surgery we're doing here people. Cordially, Bryan Owen Paper Conservator Frederick Law Olmsted NHS 99 Warren St. Brookline MA 02445 *** Conservation DistList Instance 12:68 Distributed: Friday, February 19, 1999 Message Id: cdl-12-68-002 ***Received on Thursday, 18 February, 1999