Subject: Professional qualifications
This is in response to some comments by Miriam Tierney and many of the off-list email comments I received over the past few days. The question of training and standards has had a long history in conservation as evinced by the notes in the Museums Journal of England in the 1930s, especially after the review produced by R.B. Dent in 1931 on the London "Short Training Course" of that year. How standards and recognition will affect the field has always been an important consideration with special concern on how it would affect individual practice and who would establish standards and how they could be enforced. In Baer and Majewski's review of the history of teaching conservation in the USA (1975) they describe several programs in existence then, with special reference to the Fogg which is described as a general apprenticeship program and they called for minimum professional standards and licensing of conservators. In another talk from the 1975 Venice ICOM Conference Hodges and Hodkinson analyze the training programs and apprenticeships by comparing their different approaches. They call for international cooperation to establish accreditation procedures for the different programs and apprenticeship graduates. It is unfortunate that the pre-WWII generation began this project of training over 60 years ago, which was carried forward by the post-WWII generation with the creation of a number of formal training programs, but allowed to fallow by the generation of the 70s and 80s. I still think that Hodges and Hodkinson's elegant article is a fine jumping off point to construct a mechanism to establish a consistent form of equivalence for conservators from the programs and apprenticeships. We just need the will to proceed. Such a process would have to be skills based and not just (as in the process for lawyers in the US today) an examination. This issue would profit from a formal dialogue. Niccolo Caldararo Director and Chief Conservator Conservation Art Service *** Conservation DistList Instance 12:65 Distributed: Tuesday, February 9, 1999 Message Id: cdl-12-65-002 ***Received on Friday, 5 February, 1999