Subject: Herpetological collection
Roberta Salmaso <rsalmaso [at] comune__verona__it> writes >In our museum there is an old Herpetological collection (1850-1900) >preserved in formalin. For health safety we would like to substitute >formalin with 70% alcohol. Anyone knows if this change could damage >the specimens? I looked into these questions a few years ago for a natural history curator colleague. On the formalin question: Jonathan Bayliss "Removing Wet Specimens from Long Term Storage in Formalin" Conserve O Gram 11/1, 1993. Published by the National Park Service **** Moderator's comments: See: <URL:http://www.cr.nps.gov/csd/publications/conserveogram/11-01.pdf> Of course, given that formaldehyde (formalin = 10% formaldehyde in water) is a known carcinogen, safety precautions and disposal are extremely important. There is also a great introduction by John Simmons to fluid collections: "Storage in Fluid Preservatives" in the book Storage of Natural History Collections, Volume 1, published by the Society for the Preservation of Natural History Collections. (Sorry, I don't have the full reference here). He recommends using 70% ethanol over isopropanol, which may dehydrate specimens severely, even at 50%. It is also more toxic than ethanol. On the rehydrating question, I think that this is the latest: Vogt, K.D. 1991. "Reconstituting Dehydrated Museum Specimens" Curator 34(2):125:131 Although I talked to several people working in natural history collections who cautioned that it may be best to leave the specimens in dehydrated condition. Apparently tissues undergo a great deal of damage when they dehydrate, which will not be reversed when they are reconstituted. Hope this is of some help, Kathy Hall Institute of Nautical Archaeology Bodrum, Turkey. *** Conservation DistList Instance 12:61 Distributed: Wednesday, January 27, 1999 Message Id: cdl-12-61-003 ***Received on Saturday, 23 January, 1999