Subject: Computer output microform
Could any one out there provide me with information on computer output microform and its quality in relation to the standards, now well established in the US and the UK, for 35mm microfilm as a preservation format. I have a specific reason for asking this but it is not necessary to waste space here giving the reason. I share the commonly held view in the preservation field that 35mm microfilm produced to preservation standards should be viewed as the preservation format and the digital medium viewed as an access medium. Both serve the information world, one ensuring the preservation of intellectual content and the other improving access. My question relates to a situation where both forms would be held and a decision being made on whether to film first and then digitise, or digitise first and produce the microform from the digitised content using COM. Will the output microform meet current preservation standards in terms of resolution, density, reduction ratios and processing requirements e.g., thiosulphate levels? Resolution, density and reduction ratios become particularly important in relation to 19 and 20 century newspaper filming and this should be taken into account. I have experience of microfilming and digital production but little experience of COM and would find it very helpful to hear the views of others. In particular, institutional policy on COM as a preservation format. My question is basically, if a preservation microform and a digital form are both to be held, does COM meet the preservation standards we demand? Thank you in advance, John McIntyre Head of Preservation National Library of Scotland George IV Bridge Edinburgh EH1 1EW UK *** Conservation DistList Instance 12:60 Distributed: Friday, January 22, 1999 Message Id: cdl-12-60-010 ***Received on Thursday, 21 January, 1999