Subject: Disaster preparedness and management priorities
Alan G. Howell <ahowell<-a t->ilanet< . >slnsw< . >gov< . >au> on behalf of Tegan Henderson >A colleague I have works for a small institution in which management >will not acknowledge disaster planning as a priority. If you want to convince management about the necessity of disaster planning I advice you to print this message and forward it to those responsible. Three museum fires within one year, flooded libraries in Poland, the incompetent reaction in Italy after the earthquakes. The Museum Security Network (web site and mailing list has 'collected' over 400pp of information about incidents with cultural property since December 1996 (within ten months!). You can read the full archive at: <URL:http://museum-security.org/artcrime.html> or at: <URL:http://museum-security.org/mail.html> The messages below are about museum fires. At the Museum Security Web site you can find samples of disaster and salvage plans (and much more information in relevant fields) The following appeared in various lists and are reproduced without the knowledge or consent of the authors Messages About Museum Fires July 23, 1997 French firefighters douse Paris museum blaze Fire broke out in an area of the roof that was being renovated!! AGAIN: remember the Hofburg in Vienna, Windsor Castle, and the Royal Academy (May 4, 1997). All these fires were caused by construction work. This is the third museum fire within three months: Royal Academy (May), Tate Gallery (June)..... Forwarded from Museum-L From: Boylan P <p.boylan<-a t->city< . >ac< . >uk> Subject: Major Museum Fire Overnight in Paris Overnight (European time) news has been coming through of a very serious fire in the Paris Palais de Chaillot, part of the 1930s Trocodero complex, which houses several national museums and other cultural institutions, including the Musee de l'Homme, the national maritime museum the new national cinematography museum and the national museum of architecture and monumental sculpture. Early international press reports (e.g. BBC World Service radio at 1am British Summer Time) suggested that over 4,000 sq, metres (40,000 sq.ft.) of the Musee de l'Homme itself was on fire. However, the latest reports are slightly less alarming, though this was a major incident with a "Pumps 14" fire engine and crew attendance level for over three hours, with water damage (at least) in the Musee des Monuments de France. Patrick J. Boylan (Vice-President of ICOM) City University, Frobisher Crescent, Barbican, London EC2Y 8HB, UK; phone: +44-171-477.8750, fax:+44-171-477.8887; e-mail: P.Boylan<-a t->city< . >ac< . >uk World Wide Web site: <URL:http://www.city.ac.uk/artspol/> Date sent: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 14:39:24 GMT From: Claudia Nicholson <claudian<-a t->chc< . >state< . >sd< . >us> Organization: SD State Historical Society Subject: Re: again: museum fire caused by construction work >Fire broke out in an area of the roof that was being renovated!! >AGAIN: remember the Hofburg in Vienna, Windsor Castle, and the Royal >Academy (May 4, 1997). All these fires were caused by construction >work. This is the third museum fire within three months: Royal >Academy (May), Tate Gallery (June)..... Add to these the Oskosh Public Museum in Wisconsin and the Louisiana State Museum fires--each of which was caused by construction on the roof. When is anybody going to get a clue about the dangers of construction in historic buildings? Claudia Nicholson Curator of Collections Museum of the South Dakota State Historical Society claudian<-a t->chc< . >state< . >sd< . >us Date sent: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 16:13:00 GMT From: Hodcarry <hodcarry<-a t->aol< . >com> Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com Subject: Re: again: museum fire caused by construction work Anyone who has interested in museums and/or libraries for any length of time can come up with a long list of damage and stolen items that happened during construction. I know of one large art museum that had a good security system-for example a computer kept track of who opened locks in collection areas. But the museum did not assign folks to watch construction workers who were removing walls. As a result they lost quite a few objects, recovered most when a dealer alerted police when offered some of the items for resale. I guess the point is security costs including staff people on duty have to be built into construction costs. Date sent: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 07:54:55 -0800 From: Scott Reuter <reuter<-a t->earthlink< . >net> Organization: Exhibit Safety Services Subject: Re: again: museum fire caused by construction work >Museum fires--each of which was caused by construction on the >roof. >When is anybody going to get a clue about the dangers of >construction in historic buildings? Sounds to me as if the Museum Staff were lax in developing strict guidelines to prevent such a disaster. Certainly the construction firm is responsible for the fire, but don't forget who was responsible for the collection (I think we all learned that in our first museology class). You will probably see more and more of this as museums continue to turn themselves into theme parks to draw in more visitors. Best Regards, Scott Reuter May 4 1997 Paintings rescued as fire rages in Royal Academy by Jason Burke and Richard Woods FIREMEN fought a blaze at the Royal Academy of Arts in central London last night. Flames shot from the roof and black smoke billowed down Piccadilly. Eight firefighting appliances, three helicopters and more than 100 firemen from across London were called to the scene shortly after 8pm. The fire is believed to have started on a temporary roof towards the back of the building where construction work was taking place. It spread down into the building. Some firemen precariously worked their way across the roof. Others were sent inside the building to protect the contents. Officers were stationed on the first, second and third floors to cover the exhibits with protective sheets and were preparing to carry them out if the fire threatened to spread. In two galleries up to 40 exhibits for the summer exhibition, whose hanging was finalised last Friday, had to be moved. Two sets of architectural drawings and models were destroyed. Some of the 228-year-old academy's valuable works were also threatened. The academy, founded by Sir Joshua Reynolds, holds Tondo, a sculpture by Michelangelo which 20 years ago was valued at more than 36m pounds. It regularly hosts touring exhibitions and currently has a display of works by George Grosz, the German expressionist painter, and an exhibition of political cartoons. During the past month thousands of works were submitted by contemporary artists for consideration for the summer exhibition. Last year more than 11,000 were submitted. The show usually attracts about 125,000 visitors. David Gordon, secretary of the academy, said there was no sprinkler system in the building because water was just as likely to cause damage as a small fire. More than 80 people were inside the building attending a debate on contemporary art when the alarm was raised. Sergeant Andrew Mellows of Vine Street police station had spotted the smoke, climbed a building opposite and saw that most of the roof was alight. Rachel Lumsden, a 29-year-old postgraduate at the academy, was inside the building. "The debate had been going for about an hour and a half and was very lively," she said. "At first we all ignored the alarm. But when it went off a second time they cleared the building. I am worried about my material; a lot of my work is back where the fire is." Damage from the fire and the high-pressure water pumped in to contain it is expected to run to hundreds of thousands of pounds. Paintings in the galleries below the fire were affected by the water, and fire damage to some of the walls was reported to be "extensive". The academy is already facing a financial crisis. Last year it had an annual deficit of 31m pounds, accumulated debts of 33m pounds and an overdraft of 32.25m pounds. It had not been helped by a bursar who stole almost 3400,000 pounds from the institution to try to win back the affections of his wife. In March he was jailed for five years. Britain's Tate Gallery shut by fire 09:30 a.m. Jun 14, 1997 Eastern LONDON, June 14 (Reuter) - More than 40 works of art were removed from London's Tate Gallery on Saturday after an electrical fire broke out under one of the exhibition rooms. Smoke billowed into the gallery and the public were evacuated after the blaze started in an underground cable duct, a spokesman for the Tate said. None of the art works was thought to be damaged but the gallery--London's premier modern art venue--was closed for the remainder of the day. Regards, Ton Cremers The Museum Security Network *** Conservation DistList Instance 11:34 Distributed: Friday, October 10, 1997 Message Id: cdl-11-34-007 ***Received on Friday, 10 October, 1997