Subject: Disaster preparedness and management priorities
Alan G. Howell <ahowell<-a t->ilanet< . >slnsw< . >gov< . >au> on behalf of Tegan Henderson >A colleague I have works for a small institution in which management >will not acknowledge disaster planning as a priority. I've often thought that those of us involved in emergency preparedness need to target managers and museum directors instead of the usual conservators and collections managers, librarians and archivists, who are already sold on the idea. Usually we're "preaching to the converted". I wish there was an easy way to tackle this one. Miguel Angel Corzo, director of the Getty Conservation Institute said a few years ago (1990?) in a meeting for American museum directors, that it was essential that directors get involved in the plan, otherwise it just wouldn't happen. It has to have the support of management. One way to tackle the problem is to get museum directors thinking about museums (and I'm using the word "museum" as a generic term for any cultural institution or historic site) as a business and how much it would cost every day the building is closed; what it does to their reputation as custodians of cultural heritage; how much it costs to get up and running again; what services would be lost, delayed, or affected etc. The emergency preparedness literature related to business says that 50% of all businesses affected by disasters go under within two years, or are taken over by another company. In some cases, businesses have more or less gone belly up overnight. While that may not be the case with museums who receive government funding at federal, state, provincial or local level, it may mean that operations have to be scaled down as a result of an emergency, people fired, fewer services etc. I think it is important to stress the business resumption planning aspect of emergency and disaster planning and do a business impact analysis. What are your principal operations? What are your essential services? How long will it be before we can reopen, and to what extent? etc., etc. To give you an example, the fire at "Green Gables", the house in Prince Edward Island where Lucy Maud Montgomery set "Anne of Green Gables", is a major tourist attraction and consequently a major source of income. The fire started about a month before tourist season on the island and threatened to seriously affect the opening of the house. Fortunately, Parks Canada, which owns the property, was able to restore much of the house in time for the tourist season, so not losing the important revenue and the loss of tourists. Consider how much tourist revenue is going to be lost in Assisi and its surroundings this year as a result of the earthquakes. There must also be statistics on the amount of revenue lost in Britain a couple of years ago after tourists (particularly American) stayed away because of the IRA bombings. CCI Technical Bulletin No.18 "Fire Prevention Programs for Museums", by Paul Baril, 1997, available from CCI at $6.00 Cdn gives some fire statistics for museums, art galleries and libraries in Canada (from 1982 - 1993), taken from the Fire Commissioner's annual report, which shows that losses were estimated to be over $3m. These figures are real dollars, not adjusted to any base year, and do not include collection losses. Paul Baril also includes the number of fires over that same period (1990 was a good/bad year with approximately 45 fires). 41% of all fires were arson, or suspected arson; and 45% occurred between 7.00 pm and 5.00 am. Here are some estimated costs of museums etc affected by disasters in recent years (in millions of Canadian dollars): Fire - Weldon Law Library, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, 1985, $0.25m (cost of freeze-drying books); Fire -Royal Saskatchewan Museum, Regina, , 1990, $2m; Fire - Billings Estate Museum, Ottawa, 1992, $0.125m; Fire - Windsor Castle, 1992, $60 - 80m; Terrorist bombing - Uffizi Art Gallery, Florence, 1992, $26m; Fire - Canadian Warplane Heritage Museum, Hamilton, Ontario, 1993, $3m (does not include cost of replacing five historic planes at $1m each); Flood - Musee du Fjord, Ville de la Baie, Quebec, 1996, $1.2m (estimated cost of rebuilding walls and decontamination); Fire - Green Gable, Cavendish, Prince Edward Island, 1997, $2.3m. Hope this gives you something to work with. Keep in touch. I'd be interested to know how this works out. David Tremain Preventive Conservation Services, Canadian Conservation Institute *** Conservation DistList Instance 11:34 Distributed: Friday, October 10, 1997 Message Id: cdl-11-34-006 ***Received on Friday, 10 October, 1997