Subject: Insect infestation in gourds
Both Mr. Storch and Ms. Appelbaum have provided very good advice concerning the pest infestation in gourds. In particular, Ms. Appelbaum's comment that additional information would be useful is of particular importance. It is likely that the "dead insects" found around the gourds are what are commonly called "pantry pests," a rather generic name for a broad range of primarily beetles (although there are moths as well) commonly found in food items, although some are also at home in such pharmaceuticals as belladonna and arsenic, as well as tobacco and other fairly noxious materials. A good, popular introduction to these pests can be found in William Olkowski, Sheila Daar, and Helga Olkowski's Common-Sense Pest Control (1991, Taunton Press). Another interesting perspective is provided by Larry Pinto in the article, "Pantry Pests in Both Usual and Unusual Places," November 1991 Pest Control Magazine. These are typically tough pests to manage--for example, Getty research has found that the eggs of the cigarette beetle require 192 hours in an anoxic environment for a complete kill. This, of course, is yet another technique that Mr. Swain might be interested in exploring and I'm sure that Jerry Shiner of Keepsafe Systems could be of assistance. Also, CoOl provides Karen Motylewski's extensive notes on Non-Toxic Fumigation and Alternative Control Techniques that might be interest. But, in particular, I want to point out that any competent fumigation effort (likely using Vikane or sulfuryl fluoride) should be capable of dealing with pantry pests. However, since fumigants offer no residual effectiveness, I, too, wonder if the artwork is being re-infested, especially since pantry pests are so aggressive. In addition, having seen fumigation efforts which were not particularly competent, I wonder if the pests were identified by the pest control company in order to allow for correct dosage and "soak" rates? I also wonder if the pest control company used the appropriate equipment to insure that the concentrations were attained and held for the appropriate length of time? Perhaps Mr. Swain has all of this information, but too many institutions do not understand that pest control treatments should be as carefully documented as any other conservation treatment. There should be a complete record made of what the pest was, where the damage was noted, what pesticide was used, the concentration, the amount applied, and so forth. And this information should follow the artifact throughout its life. So, my point is that there are a variety of approaches Mr. Swain may wish to investigate, beyond either freezing or fumigation. But, regardless of technique used, he should expect that the pest control firm (or other consultant) clearly document what is being done, and why. Best, Michael Trinkley, Ph.D. Director Chicora Foundation, Inc. PO Box 8664 Columbia, SC 29202-8664 803-787-6910 *** Conservation DistList Instance 11:23 Distributed: Tuesday, September 9, 1997 Message Id: cdl-11-23-001 ***Received on Saturday, 6 September, 1997