Subject: Damage during field archaeology
Dennis Piechota <piechota<-a t->world< . >std< . >com> writes In a message dated 7/16-97-5:08:49 AM, you wrote: >On a practical level I would like to see if one can develop >pre-expedition conservation planning by introducing basic risk >management principles to predict and reduce the common field risks >and lower the artifact damage rates. My sense is that predicted >artifact volume studies, predicted artifact frequency studies, >predicted artifact type studies and more detailed artifact process >planning can make the best of difficult environments. This is a most important undertaking. A few archaeologists have considered the effects on artifacts of differential skills of excavators in removing them from sites and transit to the laboratory for examination as part of the diagenic life history of an artifact. When we compare features of degradation, abrasion, etc. on an object the skill of the excavator (usually a student volunteer), the field lab co-ordinator (usually an archaeology grad student) and the museum conservator all effect this life history. I was interested in this subject when I wrote my 1987 article in JAIC on conservation treatments in anthropology and tried to follow up on aspects when I was researching my article on ultrasound (North American Archaeologist, 1993, v.14). The most disturbing part of the research was the lack of access to archaeological reports (few are completed and written, see my article in North American Arch., 1984) or to field notes and photos. There has been a scattering of comments in the SAA Bulletin over the years, but nothing on the level that you propose. I would bet that even given the best training and preparation, desiccation of objects in field conditions would be a major factor in many locales. Sease has made great strides in communicating some of these problems to the archaeological community. I'll go over my notes and see if I can send you examples that might be helpful. Niccolo Caldararo Conservation Art Service *** Conservation DistList Instance 11:10 Distributed: Friday, July 18, 1997 Message Id: cdl-11-10-003 ***Received on Thursday, 17 July, 1997