Subject: Polystyrene
These are some observations I would like to make, (not necessarily in a coherent order), after reading Mr Trock's reply to an earlier request that I did not read as I set "no mail" while away. I believe that you will find the material inside jewel boxes is not polystyrene, but a mix of three plastics, Acrylonitrile, Butadiene and Styrene (ABS), this appears to be the same for 3.5 in Floppy disks, and many audio cassettes (though some audio cassettes are purely styrene based). ABS has a completely different set of characteristics to polystyrene, and the quantity of plasticising agent may vary dependant upon the percentage mix of the plastics. It is very difficult to identify a heavily plasticised ABS from a lightly plasticised one without sticking a red hot pin through it and sniffing, and that is very subjective (not to mention dangerous!). The plasticiser used in ABS is a subliming organic acid, (I forget the name at the moment). So ABS does not appear to sweat as do other plastics. Therefore unnoticed by us, the atmosphere of the microclimate inside a jewel box can have a pH ranging from 7 down to around 2 (that's the lowest I have measured), and you just can't tell which ones are going to be the bad ones until they mess up the CD, by which time of course, it is too late. Because of this it is wise to view every ABS jewel box with suspicion. Recently I have discovered what appears to be a complete Poly-carbonate Jewel Box which might serve as a replacement for ABS jewel boxes in an archival situation, but so far I haven't located the manufacturer. It is also possible obtain unplasticised polyethylene CD and laserdisk cases which are also good in an archival situation, but as they are not in the standard jewel box pattern, original CD paper inserts can not be stored properly together with the disks. The best method I have found is to remove the CDs from the jewel boxes completely and store them in microchamber envelopes (supplied by Conservation Resources), it is the only way to be absolutely sure. As I have said before, Polystyrene is a very broad ranged description of a material. Its reactive behaviour and plasticity and requirement for plasticiser is defined by the length of the hydrocarbon chain without necessarily changing the name of the plastic. Because of this diversity of makeup, photographic conservators I am sure would not recommend the use of PS for storing photographs, but would recommend a plastic of defined chain length. Most conservators I know recommend a specific chain length material such as unplasticised polyethylene, or Polyethylene terephthalate, but certainly not polystyrene. I must also point out that not all clear polystyrenes are plasticiser free. Although clear polystyrenes are naturally more pliable, this does not mean that plasticisers are not added in the manufacturing process, be very careful! Jonathan Farley *** Conservation DistList Instance 11:4 Distributed: Thursday, June 26, 1997 Message Id: cdl-11-4-002 ***Received on Wednesday, 25 June, 1997