Subject: Lignin and paper permanence
In reply to Paula Destefano's posting on the distlist today, I'd like to clarify the points to which she refers in my article in the CPA Newsletter and try to respond to her question. Some background first: The Canadian cooperative research project on the impact of lignin on paper permanence is just about to wrap up. When my article was written, work had completed on the first phase--the study of the impact of lignin on various papers which were submitted to accelerated aging. These results were about to be (and now have been) reported by Paul Begin of the Canadian Conservation Institute at the ARSAG conference in France in April. It was appropriate that specifics be first presented by the researchers themselves and also not to preempt their presentation at ARSAG. Since then, phase 2 has been completed and the scientists are writing up these results. Phase 2 covers the study of these same papers but with an added twist--the papers were subject to extreme exposure to pollutant gases before being aged. We are hoping that all the results will be ready for distribution and dissemination and discussion in the next few weeks. As a result my use of the word "benign" was carefully chosen to reflect first phase results. Ms Destefano is right in that there was no surprise in the results I reported. (Although I was surprised at how well alkaline lignin-containing papers did in the degree of polymerization (DP) testing). What IS new is that both physical and chemical tests were carried out first on a variety of well-characterised control samples; second, on these same samples once aged; and then, thirdly, on identical samples which were first exposed to high pollution levels and then accelerated-aged. It will be the phase 2 results, compared to the control samples of phase 1, which, I hope, will provide the information that librarians and archivists and conservation scientists will be able to use to determine the effect of lignin on permanence. I regret that my use of the word "benign" was misleading, however, until the results of the pollution work is available, we will not know how lignin behaves in a polluted environment. Is it stable if buffered? Is it a catalyst for degradation? I eagerly await the answers to these questions. Jan Michaels Preservation Policy and Planning Officer National Library of Canada *** Conservation DistList Instance 10:99 Distributed: Friday, May 9, 1997 Message Id: cdl-10-99-001 ***Received on Thursday, 8 May, 1997