Subject: Laser pointers
J. Claire Dean <clairedean<-a t->aol< . >com> writes >Does anyone have references or thoughts with regard to the possible >longterm impacts of regularly using laser pointers (the small hand >held type used to indicate points of interest on a screen when >giving a slide presentation) to highlight areas of interest on works >of art? I addressed the question to a friend of mine Dr. Igor Turovets <turovets<-a t->Hadassah< . >org< . >il> who is a specialist in laser technology and I preferred to present his complete answer except some really complicated equations, otherwise, the information is very important I believe. We consider the laser primarily as a source of thermal energy and assume that a beam of laser irradiation of constant irradiance 'I' is incident normally onto a smooth material surface. To calculate the heat flow 'H' we assume (1) that there is no melting, (2)the absorption coefficient 'a' (alfa) is constant and a laser pulse has a rectangular shape with the pulse duration 'g' (gama). The heat flow 'H' at the surface is: H = I x (1-R) where 'I' is the irradiance and 'R' is the surface reflection. Laser pointer are generally diode lasers that produce radiation at wavelength region 650-675 nm, red light. There are many different pointers, but generally speaking they have 3-5 mW output and few milliradian divergence angles. The minimal point size at 52' found in prospects of different pointers distributed by Edmund Scientific (1996 Catalog) is 4 mm * 0.6 mm. Thus the irradiance of the pointers is I < 5 mmW (4mm * 0.6mm ) = 2000W/m2. We can calculate the maximal surface temperature and it will be an overestimation, because the calculated temperature represents the case of infinitive surface irradiated with infinite beam. The overestimation will be even greater if we assume the zero reflectivity of the sample. With the above mentioned assumptions we will make calculation for two cases to present materials with large and small thermal conductivity (and diffusivity). For example we will take Ag (A) and Ag2S (B). The temperature rise after 1 minute of irradiation will be < 0.5 and < 10 Celsius in case A and B respectively. Such a small temperature rise (overestimation!) shows of possibility for thermal damage caused by pointers to art objects. Photochemical damage could be in principle caused by the laser beam, but both (1) relatively small intensity of the pointers and (2) wavelength region where the photochemical alterations are known to be extremely rare, make the probability of the photochemical damage negligible for all objects, except the eye. Thanks to Dr. Igor Turovets. Michael Maggen Senior Paper Conservator The Israel Museum. Jerusalem,Israel *** Conservation DistList Instance 10:62 Distributed: Friday, January 10, 1997 Message Id: cdl-10-62-001 ***Received on Monday, 16 December, 1996