Subject: Protest of ALA meeting in Denver
Let's do our research, folks. Persons most likely to be hurt by a low attendance at ALA Midwinter are: 1. employees of hotels and restaurants in the downtown-Denver area; 2. librarians from the Front Range who seldom or never get to attend an ALA or who do attend as their finances permit, but much appreciate the chance to attend one inexpensively. >From what I've read, it is a DENVER law/ordinance - expressly to prohibit discrimination because of such matters as sexual preference - that the state law supersedes. Also - if we refused to go to meetings in states where laws we didn't like had been passed, we'd probably never be able to meet *anywhere*. I don't see that not having ALAs in Chicago got ERA passed, either. And given that ALA has to plan - what is it? - eight years in advance, how do we know that at some time in the future some other location might be in a state that passes singularly unfortunate legislation? On the positive side, yes, we certainly do need to have the courage of our convictions. ALA's SRRT (Social Responsibilities Round Table) has put together a flier on how to make your feelings known; call ALA and they'll get you a copy. Mary L. Larsgaard UC Santa Barbara *** Conservation DistList Instance 6:33 Distributed: Thursday, December 17, 1992 Message Id: cdl-6-33-008 ***Received on Monday, 14 December, 1992