Subject: Protest of AIC Meeting in Denver
Terry Belanger once said that you always do the second most important thing you need to do. So, being in a procrastinating mode, I thought I would add my two cents to recent distlist discussions. For the record, Denver was among the Colorado cites that defeated Amendment 2. By withholding business from Denver a message is sent, but is is sent to the most appropriate place? (I'm just asking this question--I'm not sure). By keeping revenue out of Colorado, we can potentially make the point that prejudice has economic ramifications. When organizations contemplate meeting sites, one of the issues that should certainly be considered is whether or not the membership will feel comfortable attending a meeting in a location where portions of that membership are not regarded or treated equitably-- be it for religious, ethnic, racial or sexual preference reasons. Decisions where to hold meetings are as likely to be as political as they are economic -- whether or not we chose to acknowledge this reality. It is not necessarily politically "incorrect" for AIC to go to Denver as originally planned. Denver was supported as a meeting site prior to election day, so we can assume that Denver has something to offer. When we consider that AIC has already committed a significant sum of membership money in preparation for this meeting, it may be more a disservice to its membership to make changes for a meeting that is not far off. What we can do is meet in Denver, but let the Chamber of Commerce, the Hotel, and other portions of the business sector know how we feel about this issue. Let them know they are getting our business now, but may not be getting business in the future, and why. Members can try to keep our expenditures to a minimum-- no additional purchases, no extra shopping sprees. Let's face it, money talks, and that may be the only way to make biased individuals take a second look. Hopefully, this issues will stimulate some discussion at AIC. For those who think its hard to get a handful of conservators to agree on anything, this could prove to be a very lively discussion. I would be very interested to know how the American Library Association is handling this issue--they meet in Denver in January. Hilary Kaplan Georgia Department of Archives and History *** Conservation DistList Instance 6:31 Distributed: Sunday, December 6, 1992 Message Id: cdl-6-31-008 ***Received on Friday, 4 December, 1992