Re: [ARSCLIST] Fighting RIAA

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Fighting RIAA
From: Tom Fine <tflists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:49:26 -0400
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <001201c88311$c25f7e60$7b01a8c0@TOSHIBA>
References: <789771.22047.qm@web81603.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <47D5D4DF.6000104@texoma.net>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

I was going to say it'll go back to New Orthophonic but who's around to enforce that? I wonder if anyone owns that trademark anymore ...

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- From: "phillip holmes" <insuranceman@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 8:39 PM Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Fighting RIAA

If the RIAA goes out of business, who will enforce my inverse playback curve? Hmm? Will all my records revert to NAB? Columbia?

Karl Miller wrote:
I hope this isn't something that has already been posted...
   A woman unjustly accused of file sharing, fights back at the RIAA.
   Karl
http://blog.wired.com/music/2008/03/andersen-might.html

References:
- [ARSCLIST] Fighting RIAA
  - From: Karl Miller

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Editorial on Radio Broadcast Copyrights
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Editorial on Radio Broadcast Copyrights
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Fighting RIAA
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Fighting RIAA
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Fighting RIAA

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]