Re: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: New word? / technical term?

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: New word? / technical term?
From: Eric Jacobs <EricJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:13:12 -0800
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <47B11239.5050002@sympatico.ca>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <031901c86d3e$58befa50$6c01a8c0@Studgitator>
Reply-to: EricJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Monday, February 11, 2008 7:28 PM, David Lennick wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> I never encountered "outro" till sometime in the 80s
>
> <snip>

When was "outro" intro'd into the broadcast vernacular?

Where was it first used (broadcasting? elsewhere?)?

I've seen "outro" appear on the cue sheets of radio broadcast 
tapes dating to 1973.  I wouldn't be surprised if the term is
much, much older than that - it's such a logical pun on 
"in"tro.

Eric Jacobs

The Audio Archive, Inc.
tel: 408.221.2128
fax: 408.549.9867
mailto:EricJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Prev by Date: [ARSCLIST] Can anyone recommend PROPERLY reissued (no pseudo stereo, no echo added, no gating)
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: New word? / technical term?
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: New word? / technical term?
Next by thread: [ARSCLIST] Mahler records needed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: New word? / technical term?

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]