Re: [ARSCLIST] E or F?

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] E or F?
From: "Steven C. Barr(x)" <stevenc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:23:15 -0500
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <00c801c819eb$cf532200$0100007f@sympatico.ca>
References: <472546EF.8090002@sympatico.ca> <op.t0xuihvdoyipqs@svo.hsd1.mi.comcast.net> <47255CB9.1050102@sympatico.ca>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Lennick" <dlennick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> So the London Symphony Orchestra playing it somewhere between E and F is .. er
.. aaaargh.
>
Keep in mind that IN SPITE of the existence of mains-related synchronous
motors...NOT all 78 masters were cut at exactly 78.26 (or its UK equivalent)
r.p.m.!

Question...does this speed-related inaccuracy still survive for microgroove
records...?!

Steven C. Barr

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] E or F?
  - From: David Lennick

References:
- [ARSCLIST] E or F?
  - From: David Lennick
- Re: [ARSCLIST] E or F?
  - From: -=sVo=-
- Re: [ARSCLIST] E or F?
  - From: David Lennick

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] E or F?
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] E or F?
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] E or F?
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] E or F?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] E or F?

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]