Re: [ARSCLIST] "hard drive on a shelf"

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] "hard drive on a shelf"
From: Don Cox <doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:53:52 +0000
Comments: To: ARSCLIST@sun8.LOC.GOV
In-reply-to: <C2CA5A30.C29F%djmurph1@comcast.net>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <yam10795.2611.167102264@smtp.ntlworld.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

On 23/07/07, Daniel Murphy wrote:

> 
> I m not certain to speak for anyone else but your postings through
> ARSCLIST always arrive hours if not days after you send them. It is
> somewhat cumbersome to go back and find these unread messages.
> 
> Am I the only one with this issue?
> 
They arrive back here immediately after I send them, but this is often
some time after I write them. I prefer to leave a post for a while so
that I can check it before sending - very often, they are not worth
sending, on reflection.

I don't know why your email program is sorting them according to when I
write them, rather than when you receive them.

Regards
-- 
Don Cox
doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] "hard drive on a shelf"
  - From: Daniel Murphy

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] "hard drive on a shelf"
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] off-topic: guilty pleasure in hi-fi demo records
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] "hard drive on a shelf"
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] "hard drive on a shelf"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] "hard drive on a shelf"

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]