Re: [ARSCLIST] RIP: EMI

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] RIP: EMI
From: Michael Shoshani <mshoshani@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:44:40 -0500
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <465D9A6C020000330000F1B3@ntgwgate.loc.gov>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <465DFE58.5020401@sbcglobal.net>
References: <465D9A6C020000330000F1B3@ntgwgate.loc.gov>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070403)

This has actually been discussed on 78-L as well. I have noticed that, as of yet, persons on either list known to be employed by units of EMI have not chimed in. It would be interesting to read their perspective...

Michael Shoshani
Chicago

References:
- [ARSCLIST] RIP: EMI
  - From: Matthew Barton

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] RIP: EMI
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] RIP: EMI
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] RIP: EMI
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] RIP: EMI / let's clear the air
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] RIP: EMI

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]