Re: [ARSCLIST] Mass Digitization was... 'New' solution for stickey shed

[D P Ingram <darren@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 15 maj 2007, at 02.52, Tom Fine wrote:

> Here's a thought. One of the largest collections of music metadata  
> is Gracenote and also cddb. And, like everything else out
> there that is a non-paid "communal" effort, it's chock full to the  
> brim of errors and judgement calls that are sometimes right

I concur with this. It is also a problem when you get several  
"version", some with spelling errors and the like.  This is one thing  
I am trying to develop out with my project. It won't be a CDDB/ 
Gracenote but hopefully the information will be a)accurate and b)peer  
reviewable/editable.  I am just worried what happens when two experts  
collide though.   Nothing to "show" yet but hopefully in the not too  
distant future when the developer gets it into an alpha/data entry  
stage.

Rgds, Darren

---
Darren Ingram (darren at ingram.fi / www.ingram.fi)
Provider of many things including research, media, innovation and  
consultancy services.
040 738 5292 / +358 40 738 5292

"Insert pointless, humo(u)rless quotation and ASCII art here"
"Insert lengthy, boring and meaningless corporate and copyright  
disclaimer here"

09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 What does this mean  
to you?