Re: [ARSCLIST] 'New' solution for stickey shed

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] 'New' solution for stickey shed
From: "joe@xxxxxxxxxxx" <jsalerno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 21:12:31 -0500
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <C26D30FD.287FC%konrad.strauss@insightbb.com>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <4647C58F.4020403@earthlink.net>
References: <C26D30FD.287FC%konrad.strauss@insightbb.com>
Reply-to: joe@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)

So someone posted in a response that there is no documented example of a non-back coated tape exibiting sss.

Is this correct? I am sure I have some OR tapes that have SSS and are not BC'd.

Joe Salerno
713-6688650
Industrial Video Services
http://joe.salerno.com

Konrad Strauss wrote:

Don't know if anyone here frequents the TapeOp message board, but some may
find this interesting.
http://messageboard.tapeop.com/viewtopic.php?t=44638

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] 'New' solution for stickey shed
  - From: peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- [ARSCLIST] 'New' solution for stickey shed
  - From: Konrad Strauss

Prev by Date: [ARSCLIST] 'New' solution for stickey shed
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] 'New' solution for stickey shed
Previous by thread: [ARSCLIST] 'New' solution for stickey shed
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] 'New' solution for stickey shed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] 'New' solution for stickey shed

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]