Re: [ARSCLIST] Fraudulent recordings

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Fraudulent recordings
From: Scott Phillips <scottp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:46:37 -0600
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: A<yam10638.594.156751560@smtp.ntlworld.com>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <1CDA3639E0E121409B29360162A50475C03AC3@BLUE-2003.corp.blstk.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AcdSCLMpb53tZQWYTdiY4+dofvVfhQAAn4bQ
Thread-topic: [ARSCLIST] Fraudulent recordings

Ouch !! Not even a decent try at altering the fakes either. Sound Forge
or any decent free-ware software could have done this sort of clumsy
alteration...



-----Original Message-----
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
[mailto:ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Don Cox
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 3:12 PM
To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ARSCLIST] Fraudulent recordings

An interesting case of fraud in the classical record market.

http://www.charm.rhul.ac.uk/content/contact/hatto_cover.html

The research technique used to detect the fraud is new to me.

Kind regards
--
Don Cox
doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- [ARSCLIST] Fraudulent recordings
  - From: Don Cox

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Fraudulent recordings
Next by Date: [ARSCLIST] Fraudulent recordings
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Fraudulent recordings
Next by thread: [ARSCLIST] Commercial - New Auction List Now Available
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Fraudulent recordings

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]