[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings.



Yes, and the intellectual types would probably get turned into dinner by the bigger stronger moron types (cooked over piles of useless books and records). However, in a nuclear attack, virtually all non-hardened electronic devices will be rendered useless by EMP. EMP can knock out computers, and such, hundreds of miles away (far out of range of blast/heat). One of the various first strike scenarios has been to detonate nukes in the upper atmosphere, knocking out communications/command/control ,on ground and in the atmosphere, of the enemy, blinding them. Looks like we're going that direction--total annihilation. However, until that fateful day, there should be a digital version (prevents wear/tear) and a preserved original specimen. Phillip

Tom Fine wrote:
Don, this makes no sense. An occurance that would decimate every copy of every digital data would definitely destroy all other matter, too. Books and records burn faster than computers, last I checked.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Cox" <doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 6:56 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Interesting WSJ Article on when libraries should discard their holdings.



On 05/01/07, Tom Fine wrote:
Sorry but this is an uninformed statement. A company like Google or
any other halfway responsible for-profit entity has servers mirrored
and backed up nine ways to Sunday, including information spread all
over the globe in redundant locations. Likely, the data will live on
beyond the printed originals barring a nuclear holocaust, in which
case it really doesn't matter.

On the contrary, that is when it matters most. Think of the importance of the few (in some cases one only) copies of Greek and Roman books for the recovery of European civilisation after the Dark Ages.

Hard copy books and 78 rpm records are more likely to survive in a
useful state than digital data.

Regards
--
Don Cox
doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx






[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]