[ARSCLIST] Stanton D5127 stylus

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ARSCLIST] Stanton D5127 stylus
From: Marcia Segal <joule@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 10:51:41 -0500
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <9748944.1162569101550.JavaMail.root@elwamui-rubis.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
Reply-to: Marcia Segal <joule@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

To all--

I'd be interested in hearing from anyone who has used this stylus for digital transfers--quality of the transfer, comparisons with other styli used, etc.

I know this invites long responses, but please don't spend _too_ much time on this. I may have further questions based on responses.

Thanks in advance for any insights.

Sincerely,
Marcia Segal
American Folklife Center
Library of Congress
* * * * *
My opinions are my own. No, really.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Stanton D5127 stylus
  - From: Eric Jacobs

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright and the LOC - was "Incompetence..."
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Stanton D5127 stylus
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] current role of soundcards
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Stanton D5127 stylus
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

[ARSCLIST] Stanton D5127 stylus

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]