Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright and the LOC - was "Incompetence..."

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright and the LOC - was "Incompetence..."
From: Mike Richter <mrichter@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 12:39:52 -0800
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <s548b3af.002@loc.gov>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <45490618.8030200@cpl.net>
References: <s548b3af.002@loc.gov>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)

James L Wolf wrote:

Once again, I don't speak in any way for the Library. But having worked here 12 years, I've gained some understanding of the different forces in regards to copyright.

Thank you for a clear exposition. Let me add that many would perceive a conflict of interest - real or otherwise - if the LoC took a position on copyright terms. That would not preclude testimony on the implications of the law for that institution, but would be awkward if not impolitic if it went further as an official position.

Mike
--
mrichter@xxxxxxx
http://www.mrichter.com/

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright and the LOC - was "Incompetence..."
  - From: James L Wolf

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Schwann
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Mitsui / MAM-A Gold CD's
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright and the LOC - was "Incompetence..."
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright and the LOC - was "Incompetence..."
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright and the LOC - was "Incompetence..."

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]