Re: [ARSCLIST] message delivery

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] message delivery
From: Matt Sohn <mahatma57@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 20:36:56 -0400
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <003401c6faf2$5667ca30$4401a8c0@PORGIE>
References: <20061025182120.97210.qmail@web42110.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <453FB9C3.93F2A512@sympatico.ca>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

Anyone else having intermittent delivery problems with messages from this list and 78-L? Entire auction lists are failing to get to me, like the last 3 from Mikrokosmos (even when I was standing in Peter's office watching him send the last one to me).

dl

I've had quite a lot of ARSC posts ending up in my spam folder. Not sure why. I keep marking them as "not spam", but I keep seeing them making their way there.

-Matt Sohn

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] message delivery
  - From: Steven C. Barr(x)

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Mostly for laughs
  - From: David Breneman
- Re: [ARSCLIST] message delivery, was [ARSCLIST] Mostly for laughs
  - From: David Lennick

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] The Incompetence at ENHS
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] FLAC?
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] message delivery, was [ARSCLIST] Mostly for laughs
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] message delivery
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] message delivery

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]