Re: [ARSCLIST] Scotch 141

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Scotch 141
From: Tom Fine <tflists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:50:28 -0400
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <003801c6f3c8$97e7fdd0$6b01a8c0@TOMOFFICE>
References: <LISTSERV%200610191503344240.1C19@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

If 141 was the 1 mil version of 131, it would indeed be acetate.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcos Sueiro Bal" <tierecords@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 3:03 PM Subject: [ARSCLIST] Scotch 141

I notice that in Delos Eiler's list on the AES web site, Scotch 141 is listed as "polyester", but the 141 box I have right in front of me says acetate. Is this a typo? The tape inside the box sure looks like acetate.

Thanks

Marcos Sueiro Bal

References:
- [ARSCLIST] Scotch 141
  - From: Marcos Sueiro Bal

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Early stereo mass market tapes
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Early stereo mass market tapes
Previous by thread: [ARSCLIST] Scotch 141
Next by thread: [ARSCLIST] Digital Audio Workshop (NYC Area)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Scotch 141

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]