Re: [ARSCLIST] Thin tape decay

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Thin tape decay
From: Lou Judson <loujudson@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:00:32 -0700
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <s4d0aaed.058@gwia203.syr.edu>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <db6d7ea814675023a7dfb291079a628a@mac.com>
References: <s4d0aaed.058@gwia203.syr.edu>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

Thanks. Logic based on experience is pretty reliable.

By the way, I used a Number, not an umber, of them... typo!

Lou Judson • Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689

On Aug 2, 2006, at 10:38 AM, Robert Hodge wrote:

Thanks Lou! Your logic makes sense.

This was the first time I've encountered 180 minute cassettes and never used 120's personally.

Bob
loujudson@xxxxxxx 8/2/2006 11:57 AM >>>
I used to use a umber of 180 cassettes to record 3 hour long radio programs - they always returned level at about -15 to -20 from normal

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Thin tape decay
  - From: Robert Hodge

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Scotch 200 box photograph -Del's Response
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Thin tape decay
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Thin tape decay
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Thin tape decay

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]