Re: [ARSCLIST] Longevity

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Longevity
From: Don Cox <doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 14:24:50 +0000
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussi <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <001501c69e8f$ba804c00$6a01a8c0@TOMOFFICE>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <yam10410.2504.156121920@smtp.ntlworld.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

On 03/07/06, Tom Fine wrote:

> My own opinion is that some SACD discs sound really wonderful, and
> some multi-channel mixes are worthwhile but overall it's not worth a
> lot of extra expense (particularly since it's a submerging format) and
> there wouldn't even have been a window of opportunity if there were
> better CD mastering and remastering engineers out there. And, since
> the same guys also do SACD, the same percentage of SACD releases are
> really excellent (ie small percentage).

But however good the mastering engineer, he will not be able to get the
same quality on CD as he can get on SACD.
> 
> One man's opinion, etc.




Regards
-- 
Don Cox
doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Longevity
  - From: Tom Fine

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Longevity
  - From: Tom Fine

Prev by Date: [ARSCLIST] Removing musty smell/ moldy item procedures
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Baking books?
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Longevity
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Longevity
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Longevity

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]